Suppr超能文献

通过传统生化试验以及 DNA 和蛋白质分析,从非淋菌性尿道炎患者中鉴定出解脲拟杆菌。

The identification of Bacteroides ureolyticus from patients with non-gonococcal urethritis by conventional biochemical tests and by DNA and protein analyses.

作者信息

Taylor A J, Dawson C A, Owen R J

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 1986 Mar;21(2):109-16. doi: 10.1099/00222615-21-2-109.

Abstract

Twenty-seven strains of gram-negative anaerobic bacteria isolated from patients with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU-associated strains) were compared with reference strains of Bacteroides ureolyticus and representatives of other species of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium. Conventional biochemical tests, electrophoretic (PAGE) protein profiles and DNA base compositions of 29.5 +/- 1.2 mol% G + C indicated striking similarities between the NGU-associated strains and B. ureolyticus. Three of the reference strains previously assigned to that species were atypical in some respects as was one of the strains from urethritis and one strain, NCTC 10939, was incorrectly classified as B. ureolyticus. Casein hydrolysis by B. ureolyticus was the principal test difference between the two sets of strains. DNA-DNA hybridisation results of greater than or equal to 72% at optimum temperature conditions provided further evidence of the close relationship between B. ureolyticus and the NGU-associated strains and we conclude that these organisms should be identified as B. ureolyticus. There was insufficient evidence for recognising subspecies or biotypes within this revised concept of B. ureolyticus although several types (PAGE-type I, 17 strains; type II, 6 strains; type III, 3 strains) were detected which might provide the basis for future studies of hospital strains. The DNA base composition and hybridisation data indicated that B. ureolyticus was not related to other species of Bacteroides or Fusobacterium.

摘要

从非淋菌性尿道炎患者中分离出的27株革兰氏阴性厌氧菌(与非淋菌性尿道炎相关的菌株)与解脲拟杆菌参考菌株以及其他拟杆菌属和梭杆菌属物种的代表菌株进行了比较。常规生化试验、电泳(PAGE)蛋白质图谱以及29.5 +/- 1.2 mol% G + C的DNA碱基组成表明,与非淋菌性尿道炎相关的菌株和解脲拟杆菌之间存在显著相似性。先前归为该物种的三株参考菌株在某些方面是非典型的,尿道炎菌株中的一株以及NCTC 10939菌株被错误地归类为解脲拟杆菌。解脲拟杆菌对酪蛋白的水解作用是两组菌株之间的主要检测差异。在最佳温度条件下DNA-DNA杂交结果大于或等于72%,这进一步证明了解脲拟杆菌与非淋菌性尿道炎相关菌株之间的密切关系,我们得出结论,这些菌株应被鉴定为解脲拟杆菌。虽然检测到几种类型(PAGE-I型,17株;II型,6株;III型,3株),这可能为未来医院菌株的研究提供基础,但在解脲拟杆菌这一修订概念内,没有足够证据来识别亚种或生物型。DNA碱基组成和杂交数据表明,解脲拟杆菌与其他拟杆菌属或梭杆菌属物种无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验