BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 7;9(Suppl 4):e015599. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015599.
First referral hospitals, often known as district hospitals, are neglected in the discourse on universal health coverage in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, these hospitals are important for delivering safe surgery for 313 million people. This study aims to understand the structures, processes and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery in these centres in LMICs. This is a preplanned secondary analysis using data from two high-quality randomised controlled trials undergoing major abdominal surgery across six LMICs. Type of hospital was the main explanatory variable, defined according to the WHO taxonomy as first referral (ie, district or rural) and referral (ie, secondary or tertiary). Of the included 15 657 patients across 80 hospitals from 6 countries, 3562 patients underwent surgery in first referral and 12 149 patients underwent surgery in referral centres. First referral centres have lower full-time surgeons (median: 1 vs 20, p<0.001) and medically trained anaesthetists (28.6% vs 87.1%, p<0.001) compared with referral centres. Patients undergoing surgery in first referral centres were more likely to have lower rates of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grades III-V (8.1% vs 22.7%, p<0.001), but higher rates of emergency procedures (65.1% vs 56.6%, p<0.001). In first referral centres, there was a significantly higher use of WHO surgical safety checklist (99.4% vs 93.3%, p<0.001) compared with referral centres. In adjusted analyses, there were no differences in 30-day mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.62) and surgical site infection (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.90) between first referral and referral centres. Postoperative mortality and surgical site infection remain similar between first referral and referral centres in LMICs. There may be a clear need to upscale surgical volume safely in first referral centres to meet global surgical needs. High-quality research is needed to drive safe expansion of surgical workforce and strengthen referral pathways within these surgical health systems in LMICs.
一级转诊医院(通常被称为地区医院)在中低收入国家(LMICs)的全民健康覆盖讨论中被忽视。然而,这些医院对于为 3.13 亿人提供安全手术至关重要。本研究旨在了解 LMIC 中这些中心接受手术治疗的患者的结构、过程和结果。这是一项使用在六个 LMIC 中进行大型腹部手术的两项高质量随机对照试验的数据进行的预先计划的二次分析。根据世界卫生组织分类法,医院类型是主要的解释变量,定义为一级转诊(即区或农村)和转诊(即二级或三级)。在来自 6 个国家的 80 家医院的 15657 名纳入患者中,3562 名患者在一级转诊中心接受手术,12149 名患者在转诊中心接受手术。与转诊中心相比,一级转诊中心的全职外科医生人数较少(中位数:1 比 20,p<0.001),接受过医学培训的麻醉师人数也较少(28.6%比 87.1%,p<0.001)。在一级转诊中心接受手术的患者更有可能出现较低的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级 III-V 级(8.1%比 22.7%,p<0.001),但急诊手术比例较高(65.1%比 56.6%,p<0.001)。在一级转诊中心,与转诊中心相比,WHO 手术安全检查表的使用明显更高(99.4%比 93.3%,p<0.001)。在调整后的分析中,一级转诊中心和转诊中心之间 30 天死亡率(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.73 至 1.62)和手术部位感染(OR 1.30,95%CI 0.89 至 1.90)无差异。在 LMIC 中,一级转诊中心和转诊中心之间的术后死亡率和手术部位感染率仍然相似。一级转诊中心安全扩大手术量以满足全球手术需求的需求非常迫切。需要高质量的研究来推动安全扩大这些 LMIC 中手术卫生系统中的外科劳动力,并加强转诊途径。