• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部伤口缝合时常规更换无菌手套和器械以预防手术部位感染(ChEETAh):在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的一项实用、整群随机试验

Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.

出版信息

Lancet. 2022 Nov 19;400(10365):1767-1776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01884-0. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01884-0
PMID:36328045
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) remains the most common complication of surgery around the world. WHO does not make recommendations for changing gloves and instruments before wound closure owing to a lack of evidence. This study aimed to test whether a routine change of gloves and instruments before wound closure reduced abdominal SSI.

METHODS

ChEETAh was a multicentre, cluster randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries (Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa). Any hospitals (clusters) doing abdominal surgery in participating countries were eligible. Clusters were randomly assigned to current practice (42) versus intervention (39; routine change of gloves and instruments before wound closure for the whole scrub team). Consecutive adults and children undergoing emergency or elective abdominal surgery (excluding caesarean section) for a clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty operation within each cluster were identified and included. It was not possible to mask the site investigators, nor the outcome assessors, but patients were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was SSI within 30 days after surgery (participant-level), assessed by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria and on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. The trial has 90% power to detect a minimum reduction in the primary outcome from 16% to 12%, requiring 12 800 participants from at least 64 clusters. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03700749.

FINDINGS

Between June 24, 2020 and March 31, 2022, 81 clusters were randomly assigned, which included a total of 13 301 consecutive patients (7157 to current practice and 6144 to intervention group). Overall, 11 825 (88·9%) of 13 301 patients were adults, 6125 (46·0%) of 13 301 underwent elective surgery, and 8086 (60·8%) of 13 301 underwent surgery that was clean-contaminated or 5215 (39·2%) of 13 301 underwent surgery that was contaminated-dirty. Glove and instrument change took place in 58 (0·8%) of 7157 patients in the current practice group and 6044 (98·3%) of 6144 patients in the intervention group. The SSI rate was 1280 (18·9%) of 6768 in the current practice group versus 931 (16·0%) of 5789 in the intervention group (adjusted risk ratio: 0·87, 95% CI 0·79-0·95; p=0·0032). There was no evidence to suggest heterogeneity of effect across any of the prespecified subgroup analyses. We did not anticipate or collect any specific data on serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

This trial showed a robust benefit to routinely changing gloves and instruments before abdominal wound closure. We suggest that it should be widely implemented into surgical practice around the world.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinician Scientist Award, NIHR Global Health Research Unit Grant, Mölnlycke Healthcare.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)仍是全球最常见的手术并发症。由于缺乏证据,世界卫生组织未就伤口缝合前更换手套和器械提出建议。本研究旨在测试伤口缝合前常规更换手套和器械是否能降低腹部手术部位感染的发生率。

方法

ChEETAh是一项在七个低收入和中等收入国家(贝宁、加纳、印度、墨西哥、尼日利亚、卢旺达、南非)开展的多中心、整群随机试验。参与国任何进行腹部手术的医院(整群)均符合条件。整群被随机分配至当前做法组(42个)和干预组(39个;整个手术团队在伤口缝合前常规更换手套和器械)。在每个整群中,连续纳入接受急诊或择期腹部手术(不包括剖宫产)的成年和儿童患者,手术类型为清洁-污染手术、污染手术或脏污手术。无法对现场研究人员和结果评估人员设盲,但对患者隐瞒治疗分配情况。主要结局是术后30天内的手术部位感染(个体水平),根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的标准并基于意向性分析原则进行评估。该试验有90%的把握度检测到主要结局至少从16%降至12%,这需要至少64个整群的12800名参与者。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03700749。

结果

在2020年6月24日至2022年3月31日期间,81个整群被随机分配,共纳入13301例连续患者(7157例至当前做法组,6144例至干预组)。总体而言,13301例患者中有11825例(88.9%)为成年人,13301例中有6125例(46.0%)接受择期手术,13301例中有8086例(60.8%)接受清洁-污染手术,或13301例中有5215例(39.2%)接受污染-脏污手术。当前做法组7157例患者中有58例(0.8%)更换了手套和器械,干预组6144例患者中有6044例(98.3%)更换了手套和器械。当前做法组6768例患者中有1280例(18.9%)发生手术部位感染,干预组5789例患者中有931例(16.0%)发生手术部位感染(调整风险比:0.87,95%置信区间0.79 - 0.95;p = 0.0032)。在任何预先设定的亚组分析中,均未发现效应异质性的证据。我们未预期也未收集任何关于严重不良事件的具体数据。

解读

本试验表明,腹部伤口缝合前常规更换手套和器械有显著益处。我们建议应在全球外科手术实践中广泛实施。

资助

国家卫生研究院(NIHR)临床科学家奖、NIHR全球健康研究单位基金、莫林医疗保健公司。

相似文献

1
Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.腹部伤口缝合时常规更换无菌手套和器械以预防手术部位感染(ChEETAh):在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的一项实用、整群随机试验
Lancet. 2022 Nov 19;400(10365):1767-1776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01884-0. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Study protocol for a cluster randomised trial of sterile glove and instrument change at the time of wound closure to reduce surgical site infection in low- and middle-income countries (CHEETAH).中文:一项在中低收入国家(CHEETAH)进行的旨在减少手术部位感染的集束随机试验的研究方案,即在缝合伤口时更换无菌手套和器械。
Trials. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06102-5.
3
Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.常规腹部伤口缝合时更换无菌手套和器械以预防手术部位感染(ChEETAh):在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的一项实用、整群随机试验的基于模型的成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Feb;12(2):e235-e242. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00538-7.
4
Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial.在中低收入国家减少手术部位感染(隼鹰):一项实用的、多中心的、分层的、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1687-1699. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01548-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
Re: NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery. Routine Sterile Glove and Instrument Change at the Time of Abdominal Wound Closure to Prevent Surgical Site Infection (ChEETAh): A Pragmatic, Cluster-randomised Trial in Seven Low-income and Middle-income Countries. Lancet 2022;400:1767-76.回复:英国国家卫生研究院全球手术研究健康部门。腹部伤口缝合时常规更换无菌手套和器械以预防手术部位感染(ChEETAh):一项在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的实用整群随机试验。《柳叶刀》2022年;400卷:1767 - 1776页
Eur Urol. 2023 Jun;83(6):e158. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The costs of surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in middle-income countries: Key resource use In Wound Infection (KIWI) study.中等收入国家腹部手术后手术部位感染的成本:伤口感染关键资源利用(KIWI)研究
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Jun;136:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.023. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
8
Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study.高收入、中等收入和低收入国家胃肠道手术后手术部位感染:一项前瞻性、国际、多中心队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 May;18(5):516-525. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Aqueous olanexidine versus aqueous povidone-iodine for surgical skin antisepsis on the incidence of surgical site infections after clean-contaminated surgery: a multicentre, prospective, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.洗必泰葡萄糖酸洗必泰与聚维酮碘用于清洁污染手术术后手术部位感染发生率:一项多中心、前瞻性、盲终点、随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30225-5. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
10
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to normal activity after abdominal surgery: a pre-planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial across seven low- and middle-income countries.腹部手术后恢复正常活动:一项针对七个低收入和中等收入国家的随机对照试验的预先计划的二次分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03079-1.
2
Modeled Carbon Footprint of Change of Sterile Gloves and Instruments for Abdominal Wound Closure.腹部伤口缝合用无菌手套和器械更换的模拟碳足迹
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525355. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25355.
3
Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and International Association for Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Society Recommendations: Paper 2: Postoperative and Intensive Care Recommendations.
创伤与重症监护强化康复指南(ERATIC):外科手术强化康复(ERAS)与国际创伤外科与重症监护协会(IATSIC)学会推荐意见:论文2:术后及重症监护推荐意见
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):2029-2054. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70004. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
4
Surgical site infection reduction bundle in stoma closure: A retrospective cohort study.造口关闭术中减少手术部位感染的综合措施:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Feb 22;20:100277. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100277. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy - an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice.急诊剖腹手术中现代腹壁关闭技术的使用差异——一项关于手术实践的国际横断面调查
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02804-y.
6
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study.预防性外置可吸收合成补片联合综合伤口处理包用于高危急诊腹部手术剖腹术关闭切口的安全性和有效性:一项观察性研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00579-6.
7
Structures, processes and outcomes between first referral and referral hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries: a secondary preplanned analysis of the FALCON and ChEETAh randomised trials.低收入和中等收入国家一级转诊医院和转诊医院之间的结构、流程和结果:对 FALCON 和 ChEETAh 随机试验的二次预先计划分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 7;9(Suppl 4):e015599. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015599.
8
Strengthening health systems through surgery.通过手术加强卫生系统。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 7;9(Suppl 4):e017782. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017782.
9
Environmentally sustainable surgical systems.环境可持续性手术系统。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 7;9(Suppl 4):e015066. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015066.
10
Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia.定性驱动因素术后预防性抗生素使用和耐药性在埃塞俄比亚。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):1267. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11650-4.