Suppr超能文献

亚洲PEACH研究的方案制定与可行性:一项关于亚洲儿童围麻醉期发病率的试点研究

Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study: A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia.

作者信息

Obara Soichiro, Bong Choon Looi, Ustalar Ozgen Zehra Serpil, Abbasi Shemila, Rai Ekta, Villa Evangeline K, Ramlan Andi Ade W, Zahra Raihanita, Kapuangan Christopher, Ferdiana Komang Ayu, Shariffuddin Ina Ismiarti, Yuen Vivian, Varghese Elsa, Tan Josephine S K, Kuratani Norifumi

机构信息

Teikyo University Graduate School of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Anesthesia, Tokyo Metropolitan Ohtsuka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Feb;35(2):125-139. doi: 10.1111/pan.15034. Epub 2024 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings.

AIMS

The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study.

METHODS

This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study.

RESULTS

The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2-16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing).

CONCLUSIONS

The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.

摘要

背景

亚洲地区关于小儿麻醉结局,尤其是严重危急事件(SCE)的综合数据稀缺。这凸显了开展标准化研究以评估不同环境下麻醉安全性和质量的必要性。

目的

亚洲小儿麻醉严重危急事件(PEACH)试点研究旨在测试在亚洲各地麻醉实践中调查SCE的标准化方案的可行性,评估数据收集过程,并确定主要研究的样本量。

方法

这项多中心试点研究涉及9个亚洲国家的10个机构,纳入了接受诊断或外科手术的出生至15岁儿童。使用标准化定义收集SCE数据。该研究评估了可行性并估计了主要研究所需的样本量。

结果

试点研究纳入了330例患者,SCE发生率为12.4%(95%CI:9.2 - 16.4%)。7.0%的病例观察到呼吸事件,4.9%出现心血管不稳定,0.6%发生用药错误。根据试点研究中观察到的SCE发生率,主要研究所需的估计样本量至少为10958例患者。试点研究证明了研究方案的可行性,但也发现了一些挑战,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。这些挑战包括数据收集的巨大负担、电子病例报告表(e-CRF)的技术问题、各机构患者入组的差异(每个站点从4例到86例不等)以及数据采集不完整(24.8%的身高数据和9.7%的出院数据缺失)。

结论

亚洲小儿麻醉严重危急事件(PEACH)试点研究成功验证了一项在亚洲各地小儿麻醉中调查SCE的方案。应对试点研究中发现的挑战对于生成有力数据以提高该地区小儿麻醉安全性至关重要。需要解决的关键问题包括改进数据收集方法、解决e-CRF技术难题以及确保各机构提供持续支持。

相似文献

3
Feasibility and pilot study of the Pediatric Anesthesia NeuroDevelopment Assessment (PANDA) project.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Oct;24(4):382-8. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31826a0371.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Enhanced perioperative management of children with autism: a pilot study.
Can J Anaesth. 2019 Oct;66(10):1184-1193. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01410-y. Epub 2019 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries: A scoping review of capacity and effectiveness.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;4(3):e0001953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001953. eCollection 2024.
2
The Global Anesthesia Workforce Survey: Updates and Trends in the Anesthesia Workforce.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):15-24. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006836. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Children's Anaesthesia and perioperative care challenges, and innovations.
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2023 Dec;32(6):151355. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2023.151355. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Determining Associations and Estimating Effects with Regression Models in Clinical Anesthesia.
Anesthesiology. 2020 Sep;133(3):500-509. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003425.
5
Global Safe Pediatric Anesthesia Care.
Anesthesiology. 2020 Mar;132(3):413-415. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003028.
6
Bridge the gap: The need for harmonized regulatory and ethical standards for postmarketing observational studies.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):1299-1306. doi: 10.1002/pds.4269. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
8
Reducing risk in pediatric anesthesia: What are the implications from the APRICOT study?
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jul;27(7):674-675. doi: 10.1111/pan.13177.
10
Critical incidents in paediatric anaesthesia: A prospective analysis over a 1 year period.
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;60(11):801-806. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.193658.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验