College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; Pediatric Cardiology Department, Cardiac Science Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
J Infect Public Health. 2024 Dec;17(12):102584. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102584. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
The recent unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak in Saudi Arabia necessitated an assessment of healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study assessed healthcare workers' knowledge regarding the transmission, contagiousness, presentation, and diagnosis of foodborne botulism, as well as their management practices, including contacting public health authorities, administering antitoxin, preparedness to respond to botulism cases and consulting generative Artificial Intelligent (AI)-chatbots, like ChatGPT.
A cross-sectional online survey targeting Saudi HCWs was conducted from May 6-19, 2024, following the first foodborne botulism outbreak. The survey, developed by infectious disease and public health experts according to the Saudi Public Health Authority (SPHA) botulism guidelines, covered several sections: demographics, knowledge about foodborne botulism, attitudes and perceptions, intended practices, and worry level. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, multivariable linear regression to assess factors influencing knowledge, and multivariable logistic binary regression to evaluate factors affecting confidence in handling botulism.
Among the 1058 participants, the knowledge score was 9.69/20 (48.4 % correct ± 18 %), with higher scores among HCWs working in tertiary centers, older than 34 years, reading SPHA botulism protocol, and using scientific journals as main information sources. HCWs consulting ChatGPT had significantly lower knowledge scores (p-value < 0.001). HCWs displayed highly intended practices in managing botulism, with a mean score of 4.10/5. The self-rated management confidence was moderate (2.84 ± 1.05 out of 5-points). Multivariable logistic binary regression showed that previous experience with botulism and reading SPHA protocol were the most significant factors associated with a higher management confidence.
This study highlights significant HCWs' knowledge gaps during unprecedented foodborne botulism outbreak. Previous experience with botulism cases and reading recent guidelines were associated with higher knowledge and confidence, while reliance on ChatGPT was linked to lower scores. This study emphasizes the importance of timely publishing local guidelines to favorably affect both knowledge and confidence to deal with infectious outbreaks. Future research should evaluate long-term effectiveness of educational interventions.
沙特阿拉伯最近发生了史无前例的食源性肉毒杆菌中毒暴发事件,因此有必要评估医护人员(HCWs)的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。本研究评估了医护人员对食源性肉毒杆菌中毒的传播、传染性、表现和诊断的了解,以及他们的管理实践,包括联系公共卫生当局、使用抗毒素、对肉毒杆菌病例做出反应的准备以及咨询生成式人工智能(AI)-聊天机器人,如 ChatGPT。
2024 年 5 月 6 日至 19 日,在首次发生食源性肉毒杆菌中毒暴发后,对沙特阿拉伯的 HCWs 进行了一项横断面在线调查。该调查由传染病和公共卫生专家根据沙特公共卫生管理局(SPHA)肉毒杆菌指南制定,涵盖了以下几个部分:人口统计学、食源性肉毒杆菌中毒知识、态度和看法、预期做法以及担忧程度。统计分析包括描述性统计、多变量线性回归评估影响知识的因素,以及多变量逻辑二元回归评估影响处理肉毒杆菌信心的因素。
在 1058 名参与者中,知识得分为 9.69/20(48.4%正确±18%),在三级中心工作、年龄大于 34 岁、阅读 SPHA 肉毒杆菌方案以及使用科学期刊作为主要信息来源的 HCWs 中得分较高。咨询 ChatGPT 的 HCWs 知识得分显著较低(p 值<0.001)。HCWs 在管理肉毒杆菌方面表现出高度的预期做法,平均得分为 4.10/5。自我评估的管理信心处于中等水平(5 分制的 2.84±1.05)。多变量逻辑二元回归显示,以前接触过肉毒杆菌病例和阅读 SPHA 方案是与更高管理信心最相关的因素。
本研究强调了在史无前例的食源性肉毒杆菌中毒暴发期间,HCWs 存在显著的知识差距。以前接触过肉毒杆菌病例和阅读最新指南与更高的知识和信心相关,而依赖 ChatGPT 则与较低的分数相关。本研究强调了及时发布本地指南以有利地影响处理传染病暴发的知识和信心的重要性。未来的研究应评估教育干预措施的长期效果。