Yue Chao, Xu Mengyang, Ciais Philippe, Tao Shu, Shen Huizhong, Chang Jinfeng, Li Wei, Deng Lei, He Junhao, Leng Yi, Li Yu, Wang Jiaming, Xu Can, Zhang Han, Zhang Pengyi, Zhang Liankai, Zhao Jie, Zhu Lei, Piao Shilong
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 9;15(1):9708. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54100-9.
Unleashing the land sector's potential for climate mitigation requires purpose-driven changes in land management. However, contributions of past management changes to the current global and regional carbon cycles remain unclear. Here, we use vegetation modelling to reveal how a portfolio of ecological restoration policies has impacted China's terrestrial carbon balance through developing counterfactual 'no-policy' scenarios. Pursuing conventional policies and assuming no changes in climate or atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO) since 1980 would have led China's land sector to be a carbon source of 0.11 Pg C yr for 2001-2020, in stark contrast to a sink of 175.9 Tg C yr in reality. About 72.7% of this difference can be attributed to land management changes, including afforestation and reforestation (49.0%), reduced wood extraction (21.8%), fire prevention and suppression (1.6%) and grassland grazing exclusion (0.3%). The remaining 27.3% come from changes in atmospheric CO (42.2%) and climate (-14.9%). Our results underscore the potential of active land management in achieving 'carbon-neutrality' in China.
释放土地部门在减缓气候变化方面的潜力需要有目标导向的土地管理变革。然而,过去管理变革对当前全球和区域碳循环的贡献仍不明确。在此,我们利用植被建模,通过构建反事实的“无政策”情景,揭示一系列生态恢复政策如何影响了中国的陆地碳平衡。如果推行传统政策且假设自1980年以来气候或大气二氧化碳(CO)没有变化,那么在2001 - 2020年期间,中国土地部门将成为每年排放0.11Pg C的碳源,这与实际每年吸收175.9Tg C形成鲜明对比。这种差异约72.7%可归因于土地管理变革,包括造林和再造林(49.0%)、木材采伐减少(21.8%)、防火和灭火(1.6%)以及草地禁牧(0.3%)。其余27.3%来自大气CO变化(42.2%)和气候(-14.9%)。我们的研究结果凸显了积极的土地管理在中国实现“碳中和”方面的潜力。