Thawani Sujata P, Minen Mia T, Stainman Rebecca S, Friedman Steven, Bhatt Jaydeep M, Foo Farng-Yang A, Torres Daniel M, Weinberg Harold J, Kim Nina H, Levitan Valeriya, Cardiel Myrna I, Zakin Elina, Conway Jenna M, Kurzweil Arielle M, Hasanaj Lisena, Galetta Steven L, Balcer Laura J, Busis Neil A
Department of Neurology and NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2023 Mar;29(3):442-453. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0551. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
To better understand neurologists' assessments of the experiences and effectiveness of teleneurology encounters. After completing an audio-video telehealth visit with verbally consenting patients, neurologists recorded their evaluations of the encounter. Data were analyzed using standard quantitative and qualitative techniques. The study included unique encounters between 187 patients and 11 neurologists. The mean patient age was 49 ± 17.5 years. Two thirds of patients (66.8%, 125/187) were female. One third of patients (33.2%; 62) were new patients. The most common patient complaints were headache (69/187, 36.9%), focal and generalized numbness or tingling (21, 11.2%), memory difficulty (15, 8%), spine-related symptoms (12, 6.4%), and vertigo (11, 5.9%). Neurologists reported that they completed a virtual examination that provided enough information for medical decision-making in 94.9% of encounters (169/178, 9 missing responses). Fourteen of 25 examination elements important for medical decision-making could be performed sufficiently during virtual encounters. Examination assistance was needed for 16.4% (30/183) of patients, who were, on average, 17.3 years older than those who did not require assistance (62.9 years vs. 45.6 years, = 0.0002). In 19.1% (34/178) of encounters, neurologists learned clinically relevant information from seeing patients in their homes. Neurologists' assessments of the effectiveness of encounters were not related to the presence (97.2%, 35/36 effective) or absence (95%, 134/141 effective) of technical difficulties ( = 0.5729) in 177 encounters (10 missing responses). Neurologists reported that nearly 95% of teleneurology encounters were effective despite limitations of the virtual examination, occasional need for patient assistance, and technical difficulties.
为了更好地理解神经科医生对远程神经科会诊经历及效果的评估。在与口头同意的患者完成音频 - 视频远程医疗会诊后,神经科医生记录了他们对会诊的评估。使用标准的定量和定性技术对数据进行分析。该研究纳入了187名患者与11名神经科医生之间的独特会诊。患者的平均年龄为49±17.5岁。三分之二的患者(66.8%,125/187)为女性。三分之一的患者(33.2%;62名)为新患者。最常见的患者主诉为头痛(69/187,36.9%)、局部和全身性麻木或刺痛(21例,11.2%)、记忆困难(15例,8%)、脊柱相关症状(12例,6.4%)以及眩晕(11例,5.9%)。神经科医生报告称,在94.9%的会诊中(169/178,9份未回复),他们完成了一次虚拟检查,该检查为医疗决策提供了足够的信息。对于医疗决策重要的25项检查要素中的14项,可在虚拟会诊期间充分进行。16.4%(30/183)的患者需要检查协助,这些患者的平均年龄比不需要协助的患者大17.3岁(62.9岁对45.6岁,=0.0002)。在19.1%(34/178)的会诊中,神经科医生通过在家中查看患者了解到了临床相关信息。在177次会诊(10份未回复)中,神经科医生对会诊效果的评估与技术困难的存在(97.2%,35/36有效)或不存在(95%,134/141有效)无关(=0.5729)。神经科医生报告称,尽管虚拟检查存在局限性、偶尔需要患者协助以及存在技术困难,但近95%的远程神经科会诊是有效的。