• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于调查的非洲大陆大象数量减少推断。

Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline.

机构信息

CEscape Consultancy Services, Knysna 6570, South Africa.

Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2403816121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2403816121. Epub 2024 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2403816121
PMID:39527751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11621759/
Abstract

Long-term quantification of temporal species trends is fundamental to the assignment of conservation status, which in turn is critical for planning and targeting management interventions. However, monitoring effort and methodologies can change over the assessment period, resulting in heterogeneous data that are difficult to interpret. Here, we develop a hierarchical, random effects Bayesian model to estimate site-level trends in density of African elephants from geographically disparate survey data. The approach treats the density trend per site as a random effect and estimates a parametric distribution of these trends for each partitioning of the data. Data were available from 475 sites, in 37 countries, between 1964 and 2016 (a total of 1,325 surveys). We implemented the model separately and in combination for the African forest () and savannah () elephant species, as well as by region. Inference from these distributions indicates a mean site-level decline for each species over the study period, with the average forest elephant decline estimated to be more than 90% compared to 70% for the savannah elephant. In combination, there has been a mean 77% decline across all sites; but in all models, substantial heterogeneity in trends was found, with stable to increasing trends more common in southern Africa. This work provides the most comprehensive assessment undertaken on the two African elephant species, illustrating the variability in their status across populations.

摘要

长期量化时间物种趋势是确定保护状况的基础,而保护状况对于规划和确定管理干预措施又至关重要。然而,在评估期间,监测工作和方法可能会发生变化,导致数据异质性,难以解释。在这里,我们开发了一个层次化的、随机效应贝叶斯模型,用于从地理上分散的调查数据中估计非洲象的密度站点趋势。该方法将每个站点的密度趋势视为随机效应,并为数据的每个分区估计这些趋势的参数分布。数据来自 1964 年至 2016 年间的 37 个国家的 475 个地点(共 1325 次调查)。我们分别为非洲森林象()和非洲草原象()以及按地区实施了该模型。从这些分布的推断表明,在研究期间,每种物种的平均站点水平都呈下降趋势,与草原象相比,森林象的平均下降估计超过 90%。总体而言,所有地点的平均下降了 77%;但在所有模型中,都发现趋势存在很大的异质性,南部非洲的稳定到上升趋势更为常见。这项工作对这两个非洲象物种进行了最全面的评估,说明了它们在不同种群中的地位的可变性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9a/11621759/7bbf9f18e902/pnas.2403816121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9a/11621759/fb61baa72e32/pnas.2403816121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9a/11621759/7bbf9f18e902/pnas.2403816121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9a/11621759/fb61baa72e32/pnas.2403816121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b9a/11621759/7bbf9f18e902/pnas.2403816121fig02.jpg

相似文献

1
Survey-based inference of continental African elephant decline.基于调查的非洲大陆大象数量减少推断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2403816121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2403816121. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
2
The consequences of poaching and anthropogenic change for forest elephants.偷猎及人为因素对非洲森林象的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Oct;30(5):1019-26. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12679. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
3
Continent-wide survey reveals massive decline in African savannah elephants.全洲范围的调查显示非洲草原象数量大幅下降。
PeerJ. 2016 Aug 31;4:e2354. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2354. eCollection 2016.
4
Genetic evidence for two species of elephant in Africa.非洲存在两种大象的遗传学证据。
Science. 2001 Aug 24;293(5534):1473-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1059936.
5
Ecological consequences of forest elephant declines for Afrotropical forests.森林象减少对非洲热带森林的生态影响。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Jun;32(3):559-567. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13035. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Abundance, density, and social structure of African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis) in a human-modified landscape in southwestern Gabon.加蓬西南部受人为干扰景观中非洲森林象(Loxodonta cyclotis)的丰度、密度和社会结构。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0231832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231832. eCollection 2020.
7
Human footprint and protected areas shape elephant range across Africa.人类足迹和保护区塑造了非洲各地的大象分布范围。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2437-2445.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
8
The evolution and phylogeography of the African elephant inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence and nuclear microsatellite markers.从线粒体DNA序列和核微卫星标记推断非洲象的进化与系统地理学。
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 7;269(1504):1993-2006. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2070.
9
Patterns of molecular genetic variation among African elephant populations.非洲象种群间分子遗传变异模式。
Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2489-98. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01615.x.
10
A case study of apparent conflict between molecular phylogenies: the interrelationships of African elephants.分子系统发育之间明显冲突的一个案例研究:非洲象的相互关系。
Cladistics. 2005 Feb;21(1):31-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2004.00044.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge transmission, culture and the consequences of social disruption in wild elephants.野生大象的知识传播、文化与社会破坏的后果
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 May;380(1925):20240132. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0132. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Energy landscapes direct the movement preferences of elephants.能量格局引导着大象的移动偏好。
J Anim Ecol. 2025 May;94(5):908-918. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.70023. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Biodiversity promotes ecosystem functioning despite environmental change.生物多样性促进生态系统功能,尽管环境发生变化。
Ecol Lett. 2022 Feb;25(2):555-569. doi: 10.1111/ele.13936. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Human footprint and protected areas shape elephant range across Africa.人类足迹和保护区塑造了非洲各地的大象分布范围。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2437-2445.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Motivations for the use and consumption of wildlife products.使用和消费野生动物产品的动机。
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):483-491. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13578. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
The megabiota are disproportionately important for biosphere functioning.巨型生物群对于生物圈的功能具有不成比例的重要性。
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 4;11(1):699. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14369-y.
6
Extinction risk is most acute for the world's largest and smallest vertebrates.灭绝风险对世界上最大和最小的脊椎动物最为严重。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10678-10683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702078114. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Poaching empties critical Central African wilderness of forest elephants.偷猎使中非关键荒野地区的森林象数量减少。
Curr Biol. 2017 Feb 20;27(4):R134-R135. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.023.
8
Continent-wide survey reveals massive decline in African savannah elephants.全洲范围的调查显示非洲草原象数量大幅下降。
PeerJ. 2016 Aug 31;4:e2354. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2354. eCollection 2016.
9
Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size.国家社会经济指标和体型预测保护区内野生动物种群趋势。
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 1;7:12747. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12747.
10
Elephant conservation and corruption beyond the ivory trade.大象保护与象牙贸易之外的腐败问题
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):953-6. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12488. Epub 2015 Mar 31.