Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NR, U.K.
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, U.K.
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):483-491. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13578. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
The dominant approach to combating the illegal wildlife trade has traditionally been to restrict the supply of wildlife products. Yet conservationists increasingly recognize the importance of implementing demand-side interventions that target the end consumers in the trade chain. Their aim is to curb the consumption of wildlife or shift consumption to more sustainable alternatives. However, there are still considerable knowledge gaps in understanding of the diversity of consumer motivations in the context of illegal wildlife trade, which includes hundreds of thousands of species, different uses, and diverse contexts. Based on consultation with multiple experts from a diversity of backgrounds, nationalities, and focal taxa, we developed a typology of common motivations held by wildlife consumers that can be used to inform conservation interventions. We identified 5 main motivational categories for wildlife use: experiential, social, functional, financial, and spiritual, each containing subcategories. This framework is intended to facilitate the segmentation of consumers based on psychographics and allow the tailoring of interventions-whether behavior change campaigns, enforcement efforts, or incentive programs-to the specific context in which they will be used. Underlining the importance of consumer research and collaborating with local actors is an important step toward promoting a more systematic approach to the design of demand reduction interventions.
打击非法野生动植物贸易的主流方法传统上一直是限制野生动植物产品的供应。然而,自然资源保护主义者越来越认识到实施针对贸易链终端消费者的需求方干预措施的重要性。他们的目的是遏制对野生动植物的消费,或转向更可持续的替代品。然而,在理解非法野生动植物贸易背景下消费者动机的多样性方面,仍然存在相当大的知识差距,其中包括成千上万种不同的用途和不同的背景。基于与来自不同背景、国籍和重点分类群的多位专家的磋商,我们开发了一种常见的野生动植物消费者动机的类型学,可用于为保护干预措施提供信息。我们确定了 5 种主要的野生动植物使用动机类别:体验、社交、功能、财务和精神,每个类别都包含子类别。该框架旨在根据心理特征对消费者进行细分,并允许根据将使用干预措施的具体情况对其进行调整,无论是行为改变运动、执法努力还是激励计划。强调消费者研究的重要性并与当地行为者合作,是朝着促进更系统的减少需求干预措施设计方法迈出的重要一步。