Suppr超能文献

进口贸易自由化是否会恶化居民健康?来自中国的证据。

Does import trade liberalization worsen residents' health? Evidence from China.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University (SXU), Taiyuan, China.

School of Economics, Nankai University (NKU), Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 28;12:1470338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470338. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Health is important to human capital and national sustainable development. Based on the latest Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this paper uses the IVprobit model to test the impact of import trade liberalization on residents' health from the micro-individual perspective and further explores its mechanism. The results indicate that import trade liberalization brings hidden health costs, and that the negative effects on the health of people in eastern China or rural areas, people with a low education background, people under 60 years of age, and women are more significant. In areas with more serious environmental pollution, the health deterioration effect of expanding imports is more obvious. Increasing green coverage and optimizing the quality of public services can effectively alleviate this negative impact. Import trade liberalization does not affect residents' health through income gap, therefore when carrying out import trade liberalization the government should pay greater attention to the health status of the specified groups, adopt various means to improve the ecological and living environments, reduce pollution emissions, optimize the supply of public services, and ultimately improve residents' overall health level.

摘要

健康对人力资本和国家可持续发展至关重要。基于最新的中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据,本文从微观个体视角出发,运用 IVprobit 模型检验了进口贸易自由化对居民健康的影响,并进一步探讨了其作用机制。结果表明,进口贸易自由化带来了隐性健康成本,且其对东部地区或农村地区、教育程度较低、60 岁以下、女性居民的健康具有更为显著的负面影响。在环境污染较为严重的地区,扩大进口对健康恶化的作用更为明显。增加绿色覆盖面积和优化公共服务质量可以有效缓解这种负面影响。进口贸易自由化并未通过收入差距对居民健康产生影响,因此在进行进口贸易自由化时,政府应更加关注特定群体的健康状况,采取多种手段改善生态和生活环境,减少污染排放,优化公共服务供给,最终提高居民整体健康水平。

相似文献

1
Does import trade liberalization worsen residents' health? Evidence from China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 28;12:1470338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470338. eCollection 2024.
2
Health welfare in the digital era: Exploring the impact of digital trade on residents' health.
Econ Hum Biol. 2024 Aug;54:101414. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101414. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Does environmental pollution reduce residents' income? Evidence from CFPS in China.
Environ Int. 2024 Jul;189:108790. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108790. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
China's Accession to the WTO as a Shock to Residents' Health-A Difference-in-Difference Approach.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14728. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214728.
5
Import competition and the improvement in pollutant discharge from heterogeneous enterprises: Evidence from China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114809. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114809. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
The effects of trade liberalization on inequality in nutrition intake: empirical evidence from Indian districts.
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 15;24(1):1317. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18749-7.
7
Does environmental regulation improve residents' health? Evidence from China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;11:973499. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.973499. eCollection 2023.
8
Study on the Impact of Income Gap on Health Level of Rural Residents in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 21;19(13):7590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137590.
9
The impact of rural e-commerce participation on farmers' entrepreneurial behavior: Evidence based on CFPS data in China.
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300418. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues.
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;22(9):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0. Epub 2021 May 21.
2
The effects of import competition on health in the local economy.
Health Econ. 2019 Jan;28(1):44-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.3826. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
3
Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 6;110(32):12936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
4
THE OREGON HEALTH INSURANCE EXPERIMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE FIRST YEAR.
Q J Econ. 2012 Aug;127(3):1057-1106. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjs020. Epub 2012 May 3.
5
Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
6
Some mechanisms linking economic inequality and infant mortality.
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Feb;60(3):439-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.005.
7
The association between state income inequality and worse health is not confounded by race.
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;32(6):1022-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg245.
8
Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime.
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jul;47(1):7-17. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00097-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验