Department of Dental Materials and Prostheses, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Human Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network - HEID, School of Nursing of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024 Dec;13(1):2420737. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2024.2420737. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
Although an increased effectiveness has been suggested when phages and antibiotics are combined, this approach has not been tested against a mature biofilm on an endotracheal tube (ETT) surface. This study evaluated the effect of short- and long-term combined phage-antibiotic therapy in a control of a mature biofilm on an ETT surface. strains, including susceptible and resistant clinical samples, were used to develop the ETT biofilm. Biofilm was treated with 10PFU/mL of phage_2, phage_18 or 5 μg/mL of ceftolozane/tazobactam, alone or in combination with phages. The sequential combination of the two different phages and ceftolozane/tazobactam was also tested. Biofilm viability was assessed after short (2, 4, 24 h) and long-(48, 72 h) term treatment exposure using colony forming unit measurement. For long-term exposition, a new treatment shot was added every 24 h. In the sequential combination, the phage type was switched at 24 h of treatment. Regarding the susceptible strains, the treatments had limited antibiofilm effect after 2, 4 and 24 h. After 48 and 72 h, administering phages alone had no effect on biofilm viability, indicating the emergence of phage-resistant phenotypes. Nonetheless, the combined phage-antibiotic treatment reduced the biofilm viability in about 5-log, whilst antibiotic alone reduced in about 3-log. The sequential combination of phages and antibiotic reduced the biofilm viability in about 6-log. With respect to the resistant strains, no antibiofilm activity was observed regarding the treatment arms. The combination of phages and ceftolozane/tazobactam showed a synergism strain-dependent, being more apparent in susceptible strains.
尽管已经有人提出,噬菌体和抗生素联合使用时效果会增强,但这种方法尚未在成熟的气管内管(ETT)表面生物膜上进行测试。本研究评估了短期和长期联合噬菌体-抗生素治疗对 ETT 表面成熟生物膜的控制效果。 使用包括敏感和耐药临床样本在内的 株来开发 ETT 生物膜。单独或联合噬菌体使用 10PFU/mL 的噬菌体_2、噬菌体_18 或 5μg/mL 的头孢他啶/他唑巴坦处理生物膜。还测试了两种不同噬菌体和头孢他啶/他唑巴坦的序贯联合。使用集落形成单位测量法评估短期(2、4、24 小时)和长期(48、72 小时)暴露于治疗后生物膜的存活能力。对于长期暴露,每 24 小时添加一次新的治疗剂量。在序贯联合中,在治疗 24 小时后切换噬菌体类型。对于敏感菌株,在 2、4 和 24 小时后,治疗对生物膜的抑制效果有限。在 48 和 72 小时后,单独使用噬菌体对生物膜的存活能力没有影响,表明出现了噬菌体耐药表型。尽管如此,联合噬菌体-抗生素治疗使生物膜的存活能力降低了约 5 个对数,而单独使用抗生素降低了约 3 个对数。噬菌体和抗生素的序贯联合使生物膜的存活能力降低了约 6 个对数。对于耐药菌株,治疗组没有观察到任何抗生物膜活性。噬菌体和头孢他啶/他唑巴坦的联合具有依赖于菌株的协同作用,在敏感菌株中更为明显。