Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中Forel H1区与丘脑底核电刺激的比较:对运动症状和生活质量的长期影响

Field H1 of Forel vs Subthalamic Nucleus Electrical Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Long-term Effects on Motor Symptoms and Quality of Life.

作者信息

Rodrigues Juliana Passinho Azevedo, Rocha Maria Sheila Guimarães, Laube Kaito Alves Carvalho, Iglesio Ricardo, Filho Paulo Roberto Terzian, Freitas Julian Letícia de, Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha, Carlotti Carlos Gilberto, Soriano Diogo Coutinho, Godinho Fábio

机构信息

Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Santa Marcelina Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, Clinics Hospital, University of São Paulo Medicine School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Neurology, Santa Marcelina Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2025 Apr;28(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.09.473. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) relieves motor symptoms, including levodopa-responsive gait disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, STN-DBS is not indicated to treat severe, clinically resistant axial symptoms. In this scenario, field H1 of Forel (FF) stimulation (FF-DBS) is likely a feasible option, given it improves motor symptoms, including freezing of gait (FOG), as shown by a short-term study. However, no data are available about the long-term effects of this therapy. Finally, no study has compared the long-term effects of FF and STN-DBS.

OBJECTIVE

We report the long-term outcome (>five years) of bilateral FF-DBS in patients with PD. We also compare the effects of FF-DBS and STN-DBS on motor symptoms, cognition, and quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 22 patients (ten with FF-DBS and 12 with STN-DBS). Motor symptoms, cognition, quality of life, and gait symptoms were assessed using the motor part of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS III), the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, the 39-item PD quality of life (PDQ-39), and the FOG questionnaire (FOG score) respectively. The levodopa equivalent daily dose was recorded. Comparisons of the FF and STN-DBS results were conducted.

RESULT

The mean follow-up was 6.18 years (95% CI: 5.57-6.78). Compared with the preoperative period, patients with FF had an average reduction of 32.2% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 35.3% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 25.9% in the PDQ-39 (p < 0.01). There was a 7.5% decrease in cognition (p < 0.01). Levodopa equivalent dose (LED) was reduced by 26.3% (p < 0.01). The STN group had an average reduction of 39.4% in the MDS-UPDRS III scores (p < 0.01), a decrease of 23.7% in the FOG scores (p < 0.01), and an improvement of 33.2% in the PDQ-39 scores (p < 0.01). Cognition decreased by 1.6% (p < 0.01) and LED by 15.06% (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS were older than those with STN-DBS at the time of surgery: 61.2 years and 55.7 years, respectively (p = 0.02), and had longer duration of disease (p = 0.02). Patients with FF-DBS had a greater reduction in FOG (p = 0.02) than did the STN group and presented with a greater decrease in cognition (p < 0.01) after five years. STN-DBS had a greater effect on quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Both FF-DBS and STN-DBS relieved motor symptoms and improved quality of life over a long-term period. Patients with FF-DBS had a higher reduction in both FOG and in LED than did those with STN-DBS. These data support our hypothesis that FF-DBS is a safe and efficient option for treating motor symptoms in PD, including FOG in advanced stages.

摘要

背景

丘脑底核(STN)的深部脑刺激(DBS)可缓解运动症状,包括帕金森病(PD)中对左旋多巴有反应的步态障碍。传统上,STN-DBS并不用于治疗严重的、临床上耐药的轴性症状。在这种情况下,Forel的H1区(FF)刺激(FF-DBS)可能是一种可行的选择,因为一项短期研究表明,它可以改善运动症状,包括步态冻结(FOG)。然而,尚无关于该疗法长期效果的数据。最后,尚无研究比较FF-DBS和STN-DBS的长期效果。

目的

我们报告了PD患者双侧FF-DBS的长期结果(>5年)。我们还比较了FF-DBS和STN-DBS对运动症状、认知和生活质量的影响。

材料与方法

我们研究了22例患者(10例接受FF-DBS,12例接受STN-DBS)。分别使用运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS III)的运动部分、马蒂斯痴呆评定量表、39项PD生活质量量表(PDQ-39)和FOG问卷(FOG评分)评估运动症状、认知、生活质量和步态症状。记录左旋多巴等效日剂量。对FF-DBS和STN-DBS的结果进行比较。

结果

平均随访6.18年(95%CI:5.57-6.78)。与术前相比,FF患者的MDS-UPDRS III评分平均降低32.2%(p<0.01),FOG评分降低35.3%(p<0.01),PDQ-39改善25.9%(p<0.01)。认知下降7.5%(p<0.01)。左旋多巴等效剂量(LED)降低26.3%(p<0.01)。STN组的MDS-UPDRS III评分平均降低39.4%(p<0.01),FOG评分降低23.7%(p<0.01),PDQ-39评分改善33.2%(p<0.01)。认知下降1.6%(p<0.01),LED下降15.06%(p=0.02)。手术时,接受FF-DBS的患者比接受STN-DBS的患者年龄更大:分别为61.2岁和55.7岁(p=0.02),病程更长(p=0.02)。接受FF-DBS的患者在5年后FOG的降低幅度(p=0.02)比STN组更大,认知下降幅度更大(p<0.01)。STN-DBS对生活质量的影响更大。

结论

FF-DBS和STN-DBS均可长期缓解运动症状并改善生活质量。接受FF-DBS的患者在FOG和LED方面的降低幅度均高于接受STN-DBS的患者。这些数据支持了我们的假设,即FF-DBS是治疗PD运动症状(包括晚期FOG)的一种安全有效的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验