Scott Hayley M, Baker Anne M, Unsworth Carolyn A
Occupational Therapy, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Federation University, Churchill Campus, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2024 Dec;31(1):2423712. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2024.2423712. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Few evidence-based resources exist to support generalist occupational therapists address driving in practice. This pilot study aimed to evaluate whether a driving clinical decision pathway can assist generalist occupational therapists to address driving with clients.
Using a before (Timepoint-1) and after (Timepoint-2) design, data were collected at a multi-site outpatient community rehabilitation service. Medical record audits documenting how driving was addressed in practice and descriptive surveys of therapist's perceptions of pathway use were collected at Timepoints 1 and 2. A driving clinical decision pathway was implemented over 6 months. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse and compare data over time.
Timepoint-1 data from 102 client medical records, and 13 clinician surveys were compared against Timepoint-2 data from 144 records and 8 surveys. Following implementation of the pathway, the number of assessments used by generalist occupational therapists increased three-fold, to inform driving process recommendations which increased two-fold. Clinicians' self-reported knowledge, skills and confidence also increased two-fold.
A comprehensive driving clinical decision pathway provided clinicians with increased structure and support to guide practice change and promote role fulfilment in addressing return to driving with adults following a change in health status.
支持全科职业治疗师在实践中处理驾驶问题的循证资源很少。本试点研究旨在评估驾驶临床决策路径是否可以帮助全科职业治疗师为客户解决驾驶问题。
采用前后(Timepoint-1 和 Timepoint-2)设计,在多地点门诊社区康复服务中收集数据。在 Timepoint-1 和 Timepoint-2 分别收集记录如何在实践中处理驾驶问题的病历审计和治疗师对路径使用的感知描述性调查。在 6 个月的时间里实施了驾驶临床决策路径。使用描述性统计和内容分析来分析和比较随时间变化的数据。
将 102 份客户病历和 13 份临床医生调查的 Timepoint-1 数据与 144 份病历和 8 份调查的 Timepoint-2 数据进行比较。实施路径后,全科职业治疗师使用的评估数量增加了两倍,用于提供驾驶过程建议的数量增加了两倍。临床医生自我报告的知识、技能和信心也增加了两倍。
全面的驾驶临床决策路径为临床医生提供了更多的结构和支持,以指导实践变革,并在成年人健康状况发生变化后促进解决重返驾驶问题的角色履行。