• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舔舐或按压杠杆的偶然奖励之间的比较及其对神经阻滞剂的影响。

A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.

作者信息

Wauquier A, Niemegeers C J

出版信息

Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1979 Jun;239(2):230-40.

PMID:39532
Abstract

Rats implanted with an electrode in the lateral hypothalamus were trained to obtain brain-stimulation by either pressing a lever or by licking a steel drinking tube in subsequent 15-min sessions. Half of the rats began the sessions with lever-pressing, the other half began with licking. After stabilization of the response rates, rats were run in saline- or drug-sessions. During the drug sessions rats were treated with 4 doses of the following neuroleptics: haloperidol, pimozide, pipamperone, azaperone. These neuroleptics dose-relatedly inhibited licking for brain-stimulation but suppressed lever-pressing only at the highest dose tested. The lick response was thus inhibited at lower doses than lever-pressing. This differential sensitivity to neuroleptics appears not to be due to a difference in baseline response rates, schedule differences or to the motor activity involved in both responses, but rather to the different thresholds of reinforcement produced by licking and lever-pressing for brain-stimulation.

摘要

在外侧下丘脑植入电极的大鼠,在随后15分钟的实验环节中,通过按压杠杆或舔舐一根钢制饮水管来训练获取脑刺激。一半大鼠从按压杠杆开始实验环节,另一半从舔舐开始。在反应率稳定后,大鼠进行生理盐水或药物实验环节。在药物实验环节,给大鼠使用以下4种剂量的抗精神病药物:氟哌啶醇、匹莫齐特、哌泊噻嗪、阿扎哌隆。这些抗精神病药物与剂量相关地抑制了为获取脑刺激而进行的舔舐行为,但仅在测试的最高剂量下抑制了按压杠杆行为。因此,舔舐反应在比按压杠杆更低的剂量下就受到了抑制。这种对抗精神病药物的不同敏感性似乎不是由于基线反应率的差异、实验安排的差异或两种反应中涉及的运动活动差异,而是由于舔舐和按压杠杆获取脑刺激所产生的不同强化阈值。

相似文献

1
A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.舔舐或按压杠杆的偶然奖励之间的比较及其对神经阻滞剂的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1979 Jun;239(2):230-40.
2
Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward in rats.
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978 Aug;92(4):661-71. doi: 10.1037/h0077500.
3
The effects of dexetimide on pimozide-, haloperidol- and pipamperone-induced inhibition of brain self-stimulation in rats.右苄替米特对匹莫齐特、氟哌啶醇和哌泊噻嗪诱导的大鼠脑自我刺激抑制作用的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1975 Oct;217(2):280-92.
4
Intrahypothalamic noradrenaline injection in the rat enhances operant licking but not lever pressing for milk reward.
Appetite. 1986 Dec;7(4):355-64. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(86)80004-6.
5
Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.电流和匹莫齐特对已准备好的和习得的自我刺激行为的主要影响在于行为表现而非奖励。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Dec;31(4):845-53. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90394-2.
6
Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.使用抗精神病药物或6-羟基多巴胺后颅内自我刺激减少:运动功能缺陷而非奖励减少介导的证据。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 May 5;47(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00428696.
7
Task-dependent properties of brain stimulation reward.
Behav Brain Res. 1982 Apr;4(4):339-58. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90059-6.
8
Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats.大鼠操作性行为和定时诱导舔舐行为的抑制
J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):375-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-375.
9
Effects of neuroleptics on rate and duration of operant versus reflexive licking in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985 Apr;22(4):541-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90272-2.
10
Effects of d-amphetamine and caffeine on schedule-controlled and schedule-induced responding.右旋苯丙胺和咖啡因对程序控制及程序诱导反应的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):445-56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-445.