Suppr超能文献

比较不同成像设备和导航系统在颈椎椎弓根螺钉置钉中的应用:一项关于螺钉准确性、螺钉置钉时间和辐射剂量的实验研究。

Comparison of different imaging devices and navigation systems for cervical pedicle screw placement: an experimental study on screw accuracy, screw placement time and radiation dose.

机构信息

Research group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig- Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Heidelberg University, Grabengasse 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77191-2.

Abstract

Cervical pedicle screws (CPS) provide biomechanically superior fixation compared to other techniques but are technically more demanding. Navigated CPS placement has been increasingly reported as a safe and accurate technique, yet there are few studies comparing different combinations of imaging and navigation systems under comparable conditions. With this study, we aimed to compare different imaging and navigation systems for CPS placement in terms of accuracy, screw placement time and applied radiation dose. For this experimental study, navigated CPS placement was performed at levels C2 to C7 in 24 identical radiopaque artificial spine models by two surgeons with different levels of experience using three different combinations of intraoperative 3D imaging devices and navigation systems. Accuracy, time and radiation dose were compared between the groups. In total, 288 screws were placed. Accuracy was > 98% in all groups with no significant differences between groups or between surgeons (P = 0.30 and P = 0.31, respectively), but the inexperienced surgeon required significantly more time (P < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly higher with iCT compared to CBCT (P < 0.0001). Under experimental conditions, accuracy rates of > 98% were achieved for navigated CPS placement regardless of the imaging modality or navigation system used. Radiation doses were significantly lower for CBCT compared to iCT guidance.

摘要

颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)与其他技术相比提供了更好的生物力学固定效果,但技术要求更高。导航 CPS 放置已被越来越多地报道为一种安全且准确的技术,但很少有研究在可比条件下比较不同的成像和导航系统组合。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较不同的成像和导航系统在准确性、螺钉放置时间和应用辐射剂量方面用于 CPS 放置。在这项实验研究中,由两位经验水平不同的外科医生使用三种不同的术中 3D 成像设备和导航系统组合,在 24 个相同的放射性人工脊柱模型的 C2 到 C7 水平进行了导航 CPS 放置。对组间的准确性、时间和辐射剂量进行了比较。总共放置了 288 个螺钉。所有组的准确性均>98%,且组间或外科医生间无显著差异(分别为 P=0.30 和 P=0.31),但经验不足的外科医生所需时间明显更长(P<0.001)。与 CBCT 相比,iCT 的辐射剂量显著更高(P<0.0001)。在实验条件下,无论使用哪种成像方式或导航系统,导航 CPS 放置的准确性均>98%。与 iCT 引导相比,CBCT 的辐射剂量显著更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b90/11557700/2c65e9291b8e/41598_2024_77191_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验