Australia Research Centre of Public Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Rundle Mall Plaza, 50 Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05525-w.
Although the prevalence of poor oral health among older populations in Australia and the United States is higher, the contribution of ethnicity status is unknown. We aimed to estimate the contribution of social inequalities in oral health among older populations in Australia and the United States.
Cross-sectional study design using data from Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health (NSAOH 2004-06 and 2017-18) and the United States' National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003-04 and 2011-16). Participants included in the analysis were aged 65 + years. Oaxaca-Blinder type decomposition analysis was used to assess the contribution of demographic (age, sex), socioeconomic position (educational attainment, household income) and dental behaviors (last dental visit) to changes in prevalence of edentulism and non-functional dentition, and mean number of missing teeth by ethnicity status over time in Australia and the United States.
The number of participants aged 65 + years who provided clinical and sociodemographic/dental behaviour data was 1043 and 1269 in NSAOH 2004-06 and 2017-18, and 1372 and 1328 in NHANES 2003-04 and 2011-16 respectively. The prevalence of edentulism was from 13 percent (NHANES 2011-16) to 28 percent (NSAOH 2004-06), while the prevalence of non-functional dentition was from 41 percent (NSAOH 2017-18 and NHANES 2011-16) to 61 percent (NHANES 2003-04). The mean number of missing teeth was from 11 (NSAOH 2017-18) to 18 (NHANES 2003-04). The prevalence of edentulism and non-functional dentition, and the mean number of missing teeth were higher among older Australians identifying as White and the opposite results were observed among older Americans identifying as Non-White. For older adults in Australia, risk factors with the greatest impact on oral health outcomes by ethnicity status were educational attainment and household income. For older adults in the United States, the most dominant risk factor for non-optimal oral health outcomes by ethnicity status was last dental visit.
There are important policy translation implications from our findings, as they indicate that social and structural systems in Australia and the United States operate differently in the context of oral health over time among culturally diverse older citizens. This information will help inform initiatives that both target effective oral health promotion for older, culturally-diverse populations and provide evidence for the distribution of resources in the public dental health setting for this age group and cultural demographic.
尽管澳大利亚和美国的老年人口口腔健康状况不佳的比例较高,但种族地位的贡献尚不清楚。我们旨在估计澳大利亚和美国老年人口口腔健康社会不平等的贡献。
使用澳大利亚国家成人口腔健康调查(NSAOH 2004-06 和 2017-18 年)和美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES 2003-04 和 2011-16 年)的数据进行横断面研究设计。分析中包括年龄在 65 岁及以上的参与者。采用 Oaxaca-Blinder 类型分解分析评估人口统计学(年龄、性别)、社会经济地位(教育程度、家庭收入)和牙科行为(最近一次牙科就诊)对澳大利亚和美国不同种族群体的缺牙和非功能牙列以及随时间推移缺失牙数的变化的贡献。
提供临床和社会人口统计学/牙科行为数据的年龄在 65 岁及以上的参与者人数分别为 NSAOH 2004-06 年和 2017-18 年的 1043 人和 1269 人,以及 NHANES 2003-04 年和 2011-16 年的 1372 人和 1328 人。缺牙率从 13%(NHANES 2011-16 年)到 28%(NSAOH 2004-06 年),而非功能牙列的比例从 41%(NSAOH 2017-18 年和 NHANES 2011-16 年)到 61%(NHANES 2003-04 年)。缺失牙的平均数量从 11 颗(NSAOH 2017-18 年)到 18 颗(NHANES 2003-04 年)。澳大利亚老年人中自认为是白人的人缺牙和非功能牙列的比例以及平均缺失牙数较高,而美国老年人中自认为是非白人的人则相反。对于澳大利亚的老年人来说,按种族地位划分,对口腔健康结果影响最大的风险因素是教育程度和家庭收入。对于美国的老年人来说,按种族地位划分,对非最佳口腔健康结果影响最大的风险因素是最近一次的牙科就诊。
我们的研究结果具有重要的政策转化意义,因为它们表明,在澳大利亚和美国,随着时间的推移,不同文化背景的老年公民的口腔健康状况存在不同的社会和结构系统。这些信息将有助于制定既针对不同文化背景的老年人口进行有效口腔健康促进,又为这一年龄组和文化人口的公共牙科卫生资源分配提供证据的倡议。