• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇产科研究的 Altmetric 和文献计量分析:公众参与对引文潜力的影响。

Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; Cardiovascular Institute of New Jersey and the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):300.e1-300.e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013
PMID:35288087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9308639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether research engagement on social media and other public platforms results in increased citations in obstetrics and gynecology remains uncertain. The Altmetric Attention Score is a metric of research influence based on mentions on social media and public platforms, such as newsfeeds and Wikipedia. The correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores, absolute citation rates, and the Relative Citation Ratio (a novel metric of research engagement also based on citation rates) in obstetrics and gynecology research is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between Altmetric Attention Score, absolute citation rate, and Relative Citation Ratio for articles published in obstetrics and gynecology journals from 2004 to 2019. Our second objective was to identify, characterize, and compare the 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a cross-sectional altmetric and bibliometric study of all obstetrics and gynecology articles indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection from 2004 to 2019. Articles were included if they were published in obstetrics and gynecology journals according to InCites Journal Citation Reports indexing. Citation data, including citation numbers and Relative Citation Ratios, were downloaded on March 20, 2021 and merged with altmetric data from the Altmetric Explorer on the basis of each article's unique PubMed identification number. We assessed correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and number of citations and Altmetric Attention Scores and Relative Citation Ratios by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. The 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were characterized and compared using means (standard deviations) and mean differences (95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

There were 156,592 articles published in 82 obstetrics and gynecology journals and indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection between 2004 and 2019. The correlation coefficient was 0.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.19) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs number of citations and 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.11) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs Relative Citation Ratios. There was no overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 most-cited list, and there was minimal overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 highest Relative Citation Ratio list (98 unique articles on each list). Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated substantially more engagement on social media and other public platforms than most-cited articles (mean Altmetric Attention Score, 763.1 [standard deviation, 520.8] vs 49.9 [standard deviation, 81.6]; mean difference, -713.2 [95% confidence interval, -819.9 to -606.6]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 116.2 [standard deviation, 415.9]; mean difference, -661.5 [95% confidence interval, -746.2 to -576.9]). In contrast, the articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated far fewer citations than most-cited articles (mean, 39.7 [standard deviation, 47.6] vs 541.8 [standard deviation, 312.8]; mean difference, 502.0 [95% confidence interval, 439.0-565.0]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 458.9 [standard deviation, 363.5]; mean difference, 427.7 [95% confidence interval, 353.8-501.6]). Nearly half of articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were basic/translational studies, often about menopause and environmental factors impacting fertility, whereas most-cited articles and articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were more likely to be reviews and consensus statements, respectively, often about placentation and polycystic ovary syndrome, respectively. Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were more likely to be published as open-access.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be weak short-term correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and citation rates. Further study is warranted to ascertain whether there may be long-term correlation between alternative metrics and citation rates in obstetrics and gynecology.

摘要

背景

社交媒体和其他公共平台上的研究参与是否会导致妇产科研究的引用量增加,目前仍不确定。Altmetric 关注度得分是一种基于社交媒体和公共平台(如新闻Feed 和维基百科)上的提及量来衡量研究影响力的指标。在妇产科研究中,Altmetric 关注度得分、绝对引用率和相对引用率(一种基于引用率的新的研究参与度指标)之间的相关性尚不确定。

目的

评估 2004 年至 2019 年期间发表在妇产科期刊上的文章的 Altmetric 关注度得分、绝对引用率和相对引用率之间的相关性。我们的第二个目标是确定、描述和比较 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章、被引频次最高的 100 篇文章和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章。

研究设计

我们对 2004 年至 2019 年期间纳入 NIH 开放引文收藏库的所有妇产科文章进行了横断面的 Altmetric 和文献计量学研究。如果根据 InCites Journal Citation Reports 的索引将这些文章发表在妇产科期刊上,则将其纳入研究。引用数据,包括引用数量和相对引用率,于 2021 年 3 月 20 日下载,并根据每篇文章独特的 PubMed 识别号,与 Altmetric Explorer 中的 Altmetric 数据合并。我们通过计算 Pearson 相关系数来评估 Altmetric 关注度得分与引用数量之间以及 Altmetric 关注度得分与相对引用率之间的相关性。使用平均值(标准差)和平均值差异(95%置信区间)来描述和比较 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章、被引频次最高的 100 篇文章和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章。

结果

2004 年至 2019 年间,在 82 种妇产科期刊上发表了 156592 篇文章,并被纳入 NIH 开放引文收藏库。Altmetric 关注度得分与引用数量之间的相关系数为 0.18(95%置信区间,0.17-0.19),与相对引用率之间的相关系数为 0.10(95%置信区间,0.09-0.11)。在 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章列表和被引频次最高的 100 篇文章列表之间没有重叠,在 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章列表和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章列表之间只有很小的重叠(每个列表有 98 篇独特的文章)。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章在社交媒体和其他公共平台上产生了大量的互动,而被引频次最高的文章和相对引用率最高的文章则产生了更多的互动(平均 Altmetric 关注度得分,763.1[标准差,520.8] 与 49.9[标准差,81.6];平均差异,-713.2[95%置信区间,-819.9 至-606.6])和最高相对引用率文章(平均值,116.2[标准差,415.9];平均差异,-661.5[95%置信区间,-746.2 至-576.9])。相比之下,Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章的引用量远远低于被引频次最高的文章(平均值,39.7[标准差,47.6] 与 541.8[标准差,312.8];平均差异,502.0[95%置信区间,439.0-565.0])和相对引用率最高的文章(平均值,458.9[标准差,363.5];平均差异,427.7[95%置信区间,353.8-501.6])。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章中有近一半是基础/转化研究,通常是关于绝经和影响生育能力的环境因素,而被引频次最高的文章和相对引用率最高的文章分别更有可能是评论和共识声明,通常是关于胎盘和多囊卵巢综合征。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章更有可能以开放获取的形式发表。

结论

Altmetric 关注度得分与引用率之间似乎存在较弱的短期相关性。需要进一步研究以确定替代指标与妇产科引用率之间是否可能存在长期相关性。

相似文献

1
Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential.妇产科研究的 Altmetric 和文献计量分析:公众参与对引文潜力的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):300.e1-300.e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
2
A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019.1980 年至 2019 年相对引文比值最高的妇产科文献的计量分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan;3(1):100293. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100293. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Fifty years of the : an altmetric and bibliometric study.五十年的:一项替代计量学和文献计量学研究。 (你提供的原文“Fifty years of the :”似乎不完整,这里是按照现有内容翻译的。)
J Perinat Med. 2022 Oct 31;51(1):3-10. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0461. Print 2023 Jan 27.
4
Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of influential articles in reproductive biology, 1980-2019.生殖生物学有影响力论文的 Altmetric 和文献计量分析,1980-2019 年。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Aug;45(2):384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
5
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.妇产科高被引期刊文章的文献计量学分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007.
6
Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in Pediatric Surgery Core Journals.儿科外科核心期刊中 Altmetric 分数与引文的相关性。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 30.
7
An Analysis of Altmetrics in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学中的替代计量学分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):251-68. doi: 10.1111/acem.12898. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Alternative Metrics ("Altmetrics") for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals.用于评估大众普通放射学期刊文章影响力的替代计量指标(“替代计量学”)
Acad Radiol. 2017 Jul;24(7):891-897. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Correlation Between Altmetric Attention Scores and Citations for Articles Published in High-Impact Factor Ophthalmology Journals From 2018 to 2019.2018 年至 2019 年发表在高影响因子眼科学期刊上的文章的 Altmetric 关注分数与引文的相关性。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 1;140(6):623-627. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0858.
10
Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics.测量护理研究的社会影响力:对替代计量学的深入了解。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jul;75(7):1394-1405. doi: 10.1111/jan.13921. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and Traditional Bibliometrics in Top Nursing Journal Articles.顶级护理期刊文章的替代计量关注度得分与传统文献计量学之间的相关性
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Feb 22;2023:2789960. doi: 10.1155/2023/2789960. eCollection 2023.
2
An analysis of the top 500 anesthesiology publications with the highest altmetric attention scores.对500篇具有最高Altmetric关注度得分的麻醉学出版物的分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41523. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041523.
3
Online Attention to Articles Published in Otolaryngology Journals.

本文引用的文献

1
The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature.医学期刊对 Twitter 的使用:文献系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 28;23(7):e26378. doi: 10.2196/26378.
2
Predictive value of Altmetric score on citation rates and bibliometric impact.Altmetric 分数对引文率和文献计量学影响的预测价值。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa039.
3
A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019.1980 年至 2019 年相对引文比值最高的妇产科文献的计量分析。
在线关注耳鼻喉科期刊发表的文章。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Apr 1;151(4):344-350. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5251.
4
The bibliometric and altmetric analysis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy research: how great is the impact?慢性创伤性脑病研究的文献计量学与替代计量学分析:影响有多大?
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 8;15:1294125. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1294125. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology.开放获取出版对《神经精神药理学》文章计量指标的影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Mar;49(4):757-763. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01796-4. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
6
The 100 most-cited and 100 most-mentioned COVID-19-related radiological articles: a comparative bibliometric analysis.100篇被引用次数最多和被提及次数最多的与COVID-19相关的放射学文章:一项比较文献计量学分析。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1167-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10001-x. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
7
The 100 most cited papers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma between 2000 and 2019: a bibliometric study.2000年至2019年间鼻咽癌领域被引用次数最多的100篇论文:一项文献计量学研究。
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Apr 28;12(4):848-858. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-2621. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan;3(1):100293. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100293. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Social attention of the top 50 scientific articles on gastric cancer: Bibliometric and altmetric analysis.胃癌顶尖 50 篇科学论文的社会关注度:文献计量学和替代计量学分析。
J BUON. 2020 Sep-Oct;25(5):2322-2331.
5
Association Between Citations, Altmetrics, and Article Views in Pediatric Research.儿科学研究中的引文、替代计量指标与文章浏览量之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010784. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10784.
6
The Use of Social Media to Increase the Impact of Health Research: Systematic Review.利用社交媒体提高健康研究的影响力:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e15607. doi: 10.2196/15607.
7
Examining the correlation between Altmetric score and citation count in the anaesthesiology literature.研究麻醉学文献中替代计量学得分与引用次数之间的相关性。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;125(2):e223-e226. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.086. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Social Media Coverage of Scientific Articles Immediately After Publication Predicts Subsequent Citations - #SoME_Impact Score: Observational Analysis.科学文章发表后社交媒体的即时报道可预测后续引用——#SoME影响评分:观察性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):e12288. doi: 10.2196/12288.
9
Using social media to promote academic research: Identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work.利用社交媒体推广学术研究:探讨推特在分享学术成果方面的优势。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 6;15(4):e0229446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229446. eCollection 2020.
10
Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons.对国立卫生研究院支持的相对引用率作为1687名学术神经外科医生研究生产力衡量指标的评估。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 31;134(2):638-645. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS192679. Print 2021 Feb 1.