文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

妇产科研究的 Altmetric 和文献计量分析:公众参与对引文潜力的影响。

Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; Cardiovascular Institute of New Jersey and the Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):300.e1-300.e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 11.


DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013
PMID:35288087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9308639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether research engagement on social media and other public platforms results in increased citations in obstetrics and gynecology remains uncertain. The Altmetric Attention Score is a metric of research influence based on mentions on social media and public platforms, such as newsfeeds and Wikipedia. The correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores, absolute citation rates, and the Relative Citation Ratio (a novel metric of research engagement also based on citation rates) in obstetrics and gynecology research is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between Altmetric Attention Score, absolute citation rate, and Relative Citation Ratio for articles published in obstetrics and gynecology journals from 2004 to 2019. Our second objective was to identify, characterize, and compare the 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional altmetric and bibliometric study of all obstetrics and gynecology articles indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection from 2004 to 2019. Articles were included if they were published in obstetrics and gynecology journals according to InCites Journal Citation Reports indexing. Citation data, including citation numbers and Relative Citation Ratios, were downloaded on March 20, 2021 and merged with altmetric data from the Altmetric Explorer on the basis of each article's unique PubMed identification number. We assessed correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and number of citations and Altmetric Attention Scores and Relative Citation Ratios by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. The 100 articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores, the 100 most-cited articles, and the 100 articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were characterized and compared using means (standard deviations) and mean differences (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: There were 156,592 articles published in 82 obstetrics and gynecology journals and indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citation Collection between 2004 and 2019. The correlation coefficient was 0.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.19) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs number of citations and 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.11) for Altmetric Attention Scores vs Relative Citation Ratios. There was no overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 most-cited list, and there was minimal overlap among the 100 articles on the highest Altmetric Attention Score list and the 100 highest Relative Citation Ratio list (98 unique articles on each list). Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated substantially more engagement on social media and other public platforms than most-cited articles (mean Altmetric Attention Score, 763.1 [standard deviation, 520.8] vs 49.9 [standard deviation, 81.6]; mean difference, -713.2 [95% confidence interval, -819.9 to -606.6]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 116.2 [standard deviation, 415.9]; mean difference, -661.5 [95% confidence interval, -746.2 to -576.9]). In contrast, the articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores generated far fewer citations than most-cited articles (mean, 39.7 [standard deviation, 47.6] vs 541.8 [standard deviation, 312.8]; mean difference, 502.0 [95% confidence interval, 439.0-565.0]) and highest Relative Citation Ratio articles (mean, 458.9 [standard deviation, 363.5]; mean difference, 427.7 [95% confidence interval, 353.8-501.6]). Nearly half of articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were basic/translational studies, often about menopause and environmental factors impacting fertility, whereas most-cited articles and articles with highest Relative Citation Ratios were more likely to be reviews and consensus statements, respectively, often about placentation and polycystic ovary syndrome, respectively. Articles with highest Altmetric Attention Scores were more likely to be published as open-access. CONCLUSION: There seems to be weak short-term correlation between Altmetric Attention Scores and citation rates. Further study is warranted to ascertain whether there may be long-term correlation between alternative metrics and citation rates in obstetrics and gynecology.

摘要

背景:社交媒体和其他公共平台上的研究参与是否会导致妇产科研究的引用量增加,目前仍不确定。Altmetric 关注度得分是一种基于社交媒体和公共平台(如新闻Feed 和维基百科)上的提及量来衡量研究影响力的指标。在妇产科研究中,Altmetric 关注度得分、绝对引用率和相对引用率(一种基于引用率的新的研究参与度指标)之间的相关性尚不确定。 目的:评估 2004 年至 2019 年期间发表在妇产科期刊上的文章的 Altmetric 关注度得分、绝对引用率和相对引用率之间的相关性。我们的第二个目标是确定、描述和比较 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章、被引频次最高的 100 篇文章和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章。 研究设计:我们对 2004 年至 2019 年期间纳入 NIH 开放引文收藏库的所有妇产科文章进行了横断面的 Altmetric 和文献计量学研究。如果根据 InCites Journal Citation Reports 的索引将这些文章发表在妇产科期刊上,则将其纳入研究。引用数据,包括引用数量和相对引用率,于 2021 年 3 月 20 日下载,并根据每篇文章独特的 PubMed 识别号,与 Altmetric Explorer 中的 Altmetric 数据合并。我们通过计算 Pearson 相关系数来评估 Altmetric 关注度得分与引用数量之间以及 Altmetric 关注度得分与相对引用率之间的相关性。使用平均值(标准差)和平均值差异(95%置信区间)来描述和比较 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章、被引频次最高的 100 篇文章和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章。 结果:2004 年至 2019 年间,在 82 种妇产科期刊上发表了 156592 篇文章,并被纳入 NIH 开放引文收藏库。Altmetric 关注度得分与引用数量之间的相关系数为 0.18(95%置信区间,0.17-0.19),与相对引用率之间的相关系数为 0.10(95%置信区间,0.09-0.11)。在 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章列表和被引频次最高的 100 篇文章列表之间没有重叠,在 Altmetric 关注度得分最高的 100 篇文章列表和相对引用率最高的 100 篇文章列表之间只有很小的重叠(每个列表有 98 篇独特的文章)。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章在社交媒体和其他公共平台上产生了大量的互动,而被引频次最高的文章和相对引用率最高的文章则产生了更多的互动(平均 Altmetric 关注度得分,763.1[标准差,520.8] 与 49.9[标准差,81.6];平均差异,-713.2[95%置信区间,-819.9 至-606.6])和最高相对引用率文章(平均值,116.2[标准差,415.9];平均差异,-661.5[95%置信区间,-746.2 至-576.9])。相比之下,Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章的引用量远远低于被引频次最高的文章(平均值,39.7[标准差,47.6] 与 541.8[标准差,312.8];平均差异,502.0[95%置信区间,439.0-565.0])和相对引用率最高的文章(平均值,458.9[标准差,363.5];平均差异,427.7[95%置信区间,353.8-501.6])。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章中有近一半是基础/转化研究,通常是关于绝经和影响生育能力的环境因素,而被引频次最高的文章和相对引用率最高的文章分别更有可能是评论和共识声明,通常是关于胎盘和多囊卵巢综合征。Altmetric 关注度得分最高的文章更有可能以开放获取的形式发表。 结论:Altmetric 关注度得分与引用率之间似乎存在较弱的短期相关性。需要进一步研究以确定替代指标与妇产科引用率之间是否可能存在长期相关性。

相似文献

[1]
Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology research: influence of public engagement on citation potential.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022-8

[2]
A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019.

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021-1

[3]
Fifty years of the : an altmetric and bibliometric study.

J Perinat Med. 2022-10-31

[4]
Altmetric and bibliometric analysis of influential articles in reproductive biology, 1980-2019.

Reprod Biomed Online. 2022-8

[5]
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

JAMA Netw Open. 2019-12-2

[6]
Correlation Between Altmetric Score and Citations in Pediatric Surgery Core Journals.

J Surg Res. 2019-5-30

[7]
An Analysis of Altmetrics in Emergency Medicine.

Acad Emerg Med. 2016-3

[8]
Alternative Metrics ("Altmetrics") for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals.

Acad Radiol. 2017-7

[9]
Correlation Between Altmetric Attention Scores and Citations for Articles Published in High-Impact Factor Ophthalmology Journals From 2018 to 2019.

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022-6-1

[10]
Measuring the social impact of nursing research: An insight into altmetrics.

J Adv Nurs. 2019-1-24

引用本文的文献

[1]
The Correlation between Altmetric Attention Score and Traditional Bibliometrics in Top Nursing Journal Articles.

J Nurs Manag. 2023-2-22

[2]
An analysis of the top 500 anesthesiology publications with the highest altmetric attention scores.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-2-21

[3]
Online Attention to Articles Published in Otolaryngology Journals.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025-4-1

[4]
The bibliometric and altmetric analysis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy research: how great is the impact?

Front Neurol. 2024-2-8

[5]
Effects of open access publishing on article metrics in Neuropsychopharmacology.

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024-3

[6]
The 100 most-cited and 100 most-mentioned COVID-19-related radiological articles: a comparative bibliometric analysis.

Eur Radiol. 2024-2

[7]
The 100 most cited papers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma between 2000 and 2019: a bibliometric study.

Transl Cancer Res. 2023-4-28

本文引用的文献

[1]
The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature.

J Med Internet Res. 2021-7-28

[2]
Predictive value of Altmetric score on citation rates and bibliometric impact.

BJS Open. 2021-1-8

[3]
A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019.

Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021-1

[4]
Social attention of the top 50 scientific articles on gastric cancer: Bibliometric and altmetric analysis.

J BUON. 2020

[5]
Association Between Citations, Altmetrics, and Article Views in Pediatric Research.

JAMA Netw Open. 2020-7-1

[6]
The Use of Social Media to Increase the Impact of Health Research: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-7-6

[7]
Examining the correlation between Altmetric score and citation count in the anaesthesiology literature.

Br J Anaesth. 2020-8

[8]
Social Media Coverage of Scientific Articles Immediately After Publication Predicts Subsequent Citations - #SoME_Impact Score: Observational Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-4-17

[9]
Using social media to promote academic research: Identifying the benefits of twitter for sharing academic work.

PLoS One. 2020-4-6

[10]
Assessment of the NIH-supported relative citation ratio as a measure of research productivity among 1687 academic neurological surgeons.

J Neurosurg. 2020-1-31

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索