Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者术后谵妄的系统评价和荟萃分析

Postoperative delirium in patients undergoing TAVI versus SAVR - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Stavridis Dimitrios, Runkel Angelique, Starvridou Anna, Fischer Johannes, Fazzini Luca, Kirov Hristo, Wacker Max, Wippermann Jens, Doenst Torsten, Caldonazo Tulio

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Clinic Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 31;55:101544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101544. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) have different levels of invasiveness which can result in different levels of functional status after the procedure.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to detect studies showing direct comparison between TAVI and SAVR regarding postoperative functional status. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) after TAVI or SAVR, assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

We identified 1,161 manuscripts, of which 10 studies (12,015 patients) were analyzed. TAVI patients had a significantly lower incidence of POD (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI, 0.26-0.48, p < 0.01) compared to SAVR patients. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVI is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative delirium compared to SAVR without compromising length of stay or other major clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the impact of postoperative delirium on short and long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)具有不同程度的侵入性,这可能导致术后不同程度的功能状态。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以查找显示TAVI和SAVR术后功能状态直接比较的研究。主要终点是TAVI或SAVR术后谵妄(POD)的发生率,采用意识模糊评估法(CAM)进行评估。次要终点包括30天死亡率、中风、大出血和住院时间(LOS)。

结果

我们识别出1161篇手稿,其中10项研究(12015例患者)被分析。与SAVR患者相比,TAVI患者的POD发生率显著更低(OR:0.35,95%CI,0.26 - 0.48,p < 0.01)。两组间次要结局未发现显著差异。

结论

与SAVR相比,TAVI术后谵妄发生率更低,且不影响住院时间或其他主要临床结局。需要进一步研究以了解术后谵妄对短期和长期结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7281/11554914/61deff3b4d21/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验