Quach Alexandre, Madaj Barbara, Fahy Katie, Konate Aminata Tinni, Souley Ibrahim, Marcel Lucien Omar, Traore Adama, Islam Monir, Egere Uzochukwu, Ameh Charles Anawo
Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 13;4(11):e0003268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003268. eCollection 2024.
Comprehensive assessments of quality of care (QoC) are essential for monitoring progress towards meeting global and national maternal and newborn health (MNH) targets. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) and the Niger Ministry of Public Health adapted a 2014 WHO QoC tool to cover antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) and include client voices through exit interviews. The objectives of the study were to assess quality of MNH care in Niger and to document lessons learnt from implementing the LSTM QoC tool. Quality of Care (QoC) was assessed using five tools: health facility survey (using register and official record data), partograph reviews, healthcare provider knowledge assessment, exit interviews with clients, and observation of antenatal and postnatal care. A nationally representative sample of 110 public healthcare facilities at three levels (integrated health centres, district hospitals and mother-child hospitals) and 2153 women were included. Descriptive analysis with 95% confidence intervals was presented. The health facility survey showed variable access to electricity (63% [53-72]), water (72% [62-81]), and transportation (40% [31-50]). Tests and treatment for HIV, TB, and malaria were found in more than 90% of relevant facilities. During observation of first ANC visit, 62% [48-74] women were tested for HIV; 13% [5-30] for pre-eclampsia and 22% [12-36] for anaemia. Observation of PNC showed much lower rates of screening (15% [7-27] tested for HIV and 4% [0;11] for malaria). Partographs were used in 86% of deliveries with inconsistent completion. At client interviews, respectful care indicators were variable, with providers not always explaining results to clients (59% [50-67]). Targeted allocation of resources and training could impact on QoC and reduce missed opportunities for prevention, screening and management of diseases among pregnant women and babies. The QoC assessment tool proved capable of offering a comprehensive overview of priorities in MNH, while maintaining feasibility in the Nigerien context.
全面评估医疗服务质量(QoC)对于监测在实现全球和国家孕产妇及新生儿健康(MNH)目标方面的进展至关重要。利物浦热带医学院(LSTM)与尼日尔公共卫生部对2014年世界卫生组织的QoC工具进行了调整,以涵盖产前护理(ANC)和产后护理(PNC),并通过出院访谈纳入服务对象的意见。该研究的目的是评估尼日尔的孕产妇及新生儿保健服务质量,并记录在实施LSTM的QoC工具过程中吸取的经验教训。使用五种工具评估医疗服务质量(QoC):医疗机构调查(使用登记册和官方记录数据)、产程图审查、医疗服务提供者知识评估、对服务对象的出院访谈以及对产前和产后护理的观察。纳入了全国具有代表性的样本,包括三个级别的110家公共医疗机构(综合健康中心、地区医院和母婴医院)以及2153名妇女。呈现了具有95%置信区间的描述性分析。医疗机构调查显示,电力供应(63% [53 - 72])、用水(72% [62 - 81])和交通状况(40% [31 - 50])各不相同。在超过90%的相关机构中可进行艾滋病毒、结核病和疟疾的检测及治疗。在观察首次产前检查时,62% [48 - 74]的妇女接受了艾滋病毒检测;13% [5 - 30]接受了先兆子痫检测,22% [12 - 36]接受了贫血检测。产后护理观察显示筛查率低得多(15% [7 - 27]接受了艾滋病毒检测,4% [0;11]接受了疟疾检测)。86%的分娩使用了产程图,但填写情况不一致。在对服务对象的访谈中,尊重服务对象的护理指标各不相同,医疗服务提供者并不总是向服务对象解释检查结果(59% [50 - 67])。有针对性地分配资源和开展培训可能会影响医疗服务质量,并减少孕妇和婴儿在疾病预防、筛查和管理方面错失的机会。QoC评估工具被证明能够全面概述孕产妇及新生儿健康方面的优先事项,同时在尼日尔的背景下保持可行性。