Varlotto J, Voland R, DeCamp M, Khatri J, Shweihat Y, Nwanwene K, Tirona M, Wright T, Pacioles T, Jamil M, Anwar K, Bastidas J, Chowdhury N, Zander D, Silbermins D, Abdallah M, Flickinger J
Department of Oncology, Edwards Cancer Institute/Marshall University, Huntington, WV, United States.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110619. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110619. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
The role of consolidative thoracic and prophylactic brain radiation for extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients is controversial. We investigated the factors associated with the use of any radiation therapy (RT) and whether RT has a benefit to overall survival (OS) in patients receiving any systemic therapy and whether this benefit is the same if Chemotherapy (CT) or chemo-immunotherapy (CT-IO) is used.
MATERIAL/METHODS: The NCDB database was queried from years 2017-2019. Patients receiving systemic therapy- STX (CT or CT-IO) had to have at least 6 months of follow-up and have no brain metastases at diagnosis. All RT patients had to receive upfront systemic therapy, be treated 2-6 months from diagnosis, and if treated to the brain received 25 Gy in 10 fractions only. Multi-variable analyses (MVA) were used to determine factors associated with OS and selection for any radiation. Propensity matching for factors affecting OS were used to generate Kaplan-Meier OS curves. Log-rank tests were used to determine differences in Kaplan Meier survival curves for the effects of RT on OS.
The total number of patients receiving RT/STX or STX alone as well as their median follow-up (months) were (890, 17.0 mn) and (6898, 14.0mn). The median time to the start of STX and RT were 22.9 days and 152 days, respectively. MVA noted that RT had a greater effect on OS (Thorax, Brain, Both Brain/Thorax - HRs = 0.80, 0.77, 0.70) than other interventions including IO (HR 0.87) and palliative care without RT (HR 1.06). Selection for radiation depended significantly upon factors affecting OS (HR) including lack of liver metastases, females, age and Charlson co-morbidity index, but did not depend upon insurance status, race, or county income/high school graduation rates. Propensity-score matched OS curves noted the same significant effects of RT on OS in those receiving CT +/- IO, CT-IO, and CT alone with HRs of 0.68/0.68/0.68 for thoracic RT, 0.72/0.72/0.70 for brain RT, and 0.60/0.60/0.60 for brain/thoracic RT, respectively.
The patient with extensive stage small cell lung cancer who reach candidacy and receive RT may have a significant improvement in OS compared to the patients treated only with CT or CT-IO. Combined thoracic and prophylactic brain RT seems to be better than either one alone. The impact of radiation whether given to one or two sites may be more beneficial than immunotherapy added to chemotherapy.
巩固性胸部放疗和预防性脑放疗在广泛期小细胞肺癌患者中的作用存在争议。我们调查了与接受任何放疗(RT)相关的因素,以及放疗对接受任何全身治疗的患者的总生存期(OS)是否有益,以及如果使用化疗(CT)或化疗免疫疗法(CT-IO),这种益处是否相同。
材料/方法:查询2017 - 2019年的NCDB数据库。接受全身治疗 - STX(CT或CT-IO)的患者必须至少随访6个月,且诊断时无脑转移。所有接受放疗的患者必须接受 upfront 全身治疗,在诊断后2 - 6个月接受治疗,如果是脑部放疗,仅接受10次分割共25 Gy的剂量。多变量分析(MVA)用于确定与OS和选择任何放疗相关的因素。对影响OS的因素进行倾向匹配以生成Kaplan-Meier OS曲线。使用对数秩检验来确定放疗对OS影响的Kaplan Meier生存曲线的差异。
接受RT/STX或仅接受STX的患者总数及其中位随访时间(月)分别为(890,17.0个月)和(6898,14.0个月)。开始STX和RT的中位时间分别为22.9天和152天。MVA指出,与包括IO(HR 0.87)和无RT的姑息治疗(HR 1.06)等其他干预措施相比,RT对OS的影响更大(胸部、脑部、脑部/胸部均放疗 - HR分别为0.80、0.77、0.70)。放疗的选择很大程度上取决于影响OS的因素(HR),包括无肝转移、女性、年龄和Charlson合并症指数,但不取决于保险状况、种族或县收入/高中毕业率。倾向评分匹配的OS曲线显示,RT对接受CT +/- IO、CT-IO和仅接受CT的患者的OS具有相同的显著影响,胸部放疗的HR分别为0.68/0.68/0.68,脑部放疗的HR分别为0.72/0.72/0.70,脑部/胸部放疗的HR分别为0.60/0.60/0.60。
与仅接受CT或CT-IO治疗的患者相比,符合条件并接受RT的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的OS可能有显著改善。胸部和预防性脑联合放疗似乎比单独一种放疗更好。放疗对一个或两个部位的影响可能比化疗联合免疫疗法更有益。