• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用有限元分析对四种类型的发育性髋关节发育不良进行髋臼周围弧形截骨术的手术模拟,并确定截骨骨块的最佳旋转角度。

Surgical simulation of curved periacetabular osteotomy in four types of developmental dysplasia of the hip using finite element analysis and identification of the optimal rotation angle of the osteotomized bone.

作者信息

Igei Takahiro, Nakasone Satoshi, Ishihara Masato, Onaga Masamichi, Washizaki Fumiyuki, Kuniyoshi Sakura, Nishida Kotaro

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, 207, Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, 207, Uehara, Nishihara, Okinawa, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2025 Jul;30(4):656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.008
PMID:39537523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) undergo curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO) to prevent progressive osteoarthritis. The acetabulum's morphology varies with in each DDH type. Therefore, developing a three-dimensional preoperative plan is important in CPO. However, the optimal rotation angle of the osteotomized bone remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the contact pressure (CP) of the acetabular cartilage in each DDH type using the finite element analysis and the optimal rotation angle of the osteotomized bone in surgical simulation.

METHODS

This study included 23 patients (24 hips) with DDH who underwent CPO. The DDH type was determined based on a previously reported DDH type classification using radar charts. Four patients, with each patient presenting with one deficiency type, were selected for analysis. The preoperative computed tomography scan data of each patient were analyzed using a finite element analysis software. Based on each DDH type, the following CPO models were established: the preoperative model, the model rotated 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40° laterally, each lateral rotation model with 10° anterior rotation, and each lateral rotation model with 10° external rotation. Furthermore, the acetabular cartilage and the femoral head cartilage were created. The mesh model based on a 4-mm tetrahedron was generated from the CPO model. The load was set in the one-leg standing position (femur: 500 N, grater trochanter: 1000 N). The medial pubic bone, distal femur, and superior rim of the ilium were constrained. The CP of the acetabular cartilage and the number of contact surfaces in each model were evaluated. The rotation angle that was most effective in reducing the CP was examined.

RESULTS

According to the mean CP, the optimal rotation angles of the osteotomized bone in mild, anterior, posterior, and global type deficiencies were 20° laterally, 30° laterally, 30° laterally with 10° anterior rotation, and 30° laterally with 10° anterior rotation, respectively. Based on the contour diagram, the CPO models rotated anteriorly or externally increased the contact surface. The CP of the models rotated 40° laterally did not improve to greater extent than that of the models rotated 30° laterally.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal rotation angle of the osteotomized bone should be determined based on the DDH type.

摘要

背景

发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者接受髋臼周围弧形截骨术(CPO)以预防进行性骨关节炎。髋臼形态在每种DDH类型中各不相同。因此,制定三维术前计划在CPO中很重要。然而,截骨后的最佳旋转角度仍不明确。本研究旨在通过有限元分析检查每种DDH类型中髋臼软骨的接触压力(CP),并在手术模拟中确定截骨后的最佳旋转角度。

方法

本研究纳入23例(24髋)接受CPO的DDH患者。根据先前报道的使用雷达图的DDH类型分类确定DDH类型。选择4例患者,每位患者呈现一种缺陷类型进行分析。使用有限元分析软件分析每位患者的术前计算机断层扫描数据。基于每种DDH类型,建立以下CPO模型:术前模型、向外侧旋转10°、20°、30°和40°的模型,每个外侧旋转模型再向前旋转10°,以及每个外侧旋转模型再向外旋转10°。此外,创建髋臼软骨和股骨头软骨。从CPO模型生成基于4毫米四面体的网格模型。在单腿站立位设置负荷(股骨:500 N,大转子:1000 N)。对耻骨内侧、股骨远端和髂骨上缘进行约束。评估每个模型中髋臼软骨的CP和接触表面数量。检查对降低CP最有效的旋转角度。

结果

根据平均CP,轻度、前侧、后侧和整体型缺陷中截骨后的最佳旋转角度分别为向外侧20°、向外侧30°、向外侧30°并向前旋转10°、向外侧30°并向前旋转10°。根据等高线图,向前或向外旋转的CPO模型增加了接触表面。向外侧旋转40°的模型的CP改善程度不如向外侧旋转30°的模型。

结论

应根据DDH类型确定截骨后的最佳旋转角度。

相似文献

1
Surgical simulation of curved periacetabular osteotomy in four types of developmental dysplasia of the hip using finite element analysis and identification of the optimal rotation angle of the osteotomized bone.使用有限元分析对四种类型的发育性髋关节发育不良进行髋臼周围弧形截骨术的手术模拟,并确定截骨骨块的最佳旋转角度。
J Orthop Sci. 2025 Jul;30(4):656-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Is Anterior Rotation of the Acetabulum Necessary to Normalize Joint Contact Pressure in Periacetabular Osteotomy? A Finite-element Analysis Study.髋臼前旋对髋臼周围截骨术后恢复关节接触压正常化是否必要?一项有限元分析研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jan 1;480(1):67-78. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001893.
3
What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?髋关节发育不良中髋臼覆盖特征的性别差异有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1971-1983. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003126. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
4
Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis.髋臼碎片的最佳位置对于所有发育性髋关节发育不良患者都应处于放射学正常范围内吗?一项基于患者特异性的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Oct 4;11(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0445-3.
5
Visualization of acetabular coverage with radar chart before and after curved periacetabular osteotomy in dysplastic hips.在髋臼发育不良髋关节中,通过雷达图显示曲形髋臼周围截骨前后髋臼覆盖情况。
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Sep;28(5):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.07.016. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
6
Effect of periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia clarified by three-dimensional finite element analysis.三维有限元分析阐明髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋臼发育不良的效果
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Sep;15(5):632-40. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1511-z. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
7
Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节发育不良的术前或术后治疗是否与髋臼周围截骨术的结果较差相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1987-1996. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
The lateral center-edge angle as radiographic selection criteria for periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged above 13 years.髋臼周围截骨术治疗 13 岁以上发育性髋关节发育不良患者的侧位中心边缘角的影像学选择标准。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 25;21(1):493. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03515-8.
9
Evaluation of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: prospective studies examining projected load-bearing area, bone density, cartilage thickness and migration.伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术的评估:关于预计承重面积、骨密度、软骨厚度和移位情况的前瞻性研究。
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2008 Jun;79(329):4-43. doi: 10.1080/17453690610046558.
10
Impact of Periacetabular Osteotomy on Cartilage Enhancement in Crowe Group I Hip Dysplasia: A Short-Term Analysis.髋臼周围截骨术对Crowe I型髋关节发育不良软骨改善的影响:短期分析
Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 23;31:e946764. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946764.