Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织二级脑膜瘤次全切除术后辅助放疗的结果。

Outcomes of adjuvant radiation treatment following subtotal resection of world health organization grade II meningiomas.

作者信息

Petitt Jordan C, Murayi Roger, El-Abtah Mohamed E, Momin Arbaz, Halima Ahmed, Potter Tamia, Ahorukomeye Peter, Jarmula Jakub, Thapliyal Mihika, Murphy Erin S, Chao Samuel T, Suh John H, Recinos Pablo F, Kshettry Varun R

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2025 Feb;171(3):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04878-x. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Existing literature on adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection (STR) of WHO II meningiomas is limited by heterogenous patient cohorts, combining adjuvant and salvage radiation, gross total resection (GTR) and STR, primary radiation treatment vs. re-treatment, or grade II and III meningiomas, all of which have different expected outcomes. Tumor control estimates in a large homogenous patient cohort are needed to accurately counsel patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients that had immediate post-operative imaging-confirmed residual WHO grade II meningioma followed by either adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 1996 and 2020 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria (IMRT = 32; SRS = 7). Overall, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS was 81.1%, 61.2%, and 44.6%, respectively. Median follow-up time was 37 months. When comparing IMRT and SRS cohorts, baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, but significantly larger residual tumor volumes were treated with IMRT (22.2 cm vs. 6.3 cm, p = 0.004). PFS was not significantly different between IMRT and SRS at 3 years (81.1% vs. 80.0%) or 5 years (65.5% vs. 40%) (p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in radiation necrosis between groups (IMRT = 3/32 patients vs. SRS = 0/7 patients, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Our homogenous patient cohort displayed acceptable control rates at 3 years using SRS or IMRT as adjuvant therapy. No significant difference in PFS or radiation necrosis was noted between patients treated with adjuvant IMRT versus SRS.

摘要

目的

关于世界卫生组织(WHO)II级脑膜瘤次全切除(STR)术后辅助放疗的现有文献受到异质性患者队列的限制,这些队列将辅助放疗和挽救性放疗、全切除(GTR)和STR、初次放疗与再次治疗或II级和III级脑膜瘤合并在一起,而所有这些情况都有不同的预期结果。需要在大型同质患者队列中进行肿瘤控制评估,以便为患者提供准确的咨询。

方法

对1996年至2020年间术后立即经影像学证实有WHO II级脑膜瘤残留,随后接受辅助调强放射治疗(IMRT)或立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)的患者进行回顾性研究。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和对数秩检验来评估无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

39例患者符合纳入标准(IMRT = 32例;SRS = 7例)。总体而言,3年、5年和10年的PFS分别为81.1%、61.2%和44.6%。中位随访时间为37个月。比较IMRT和SRS队列时,两组的基线特征无显著差异,但IMRT治疗的残留肿瘤体积明显更大(22.2 cm对6.3 cm,p = 0.004)。IMRT和SRS在3年(81.1%对80.0%)或5年(65.5%对40%)时的PFS无显著差异(p = 0.19)。两组之间的放射性坏死无显著差异(IMRT = 3/32例患者对SRS = 0/7例患者,p = 0.32)。

结论

我们的同质患者队列显示,使用SRS或IMRT作为辅助治疗,3年时的控制率可接受。辅助IMRT与SRS治疗的患者在PFS或放射性坏死方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验