Mondal Himel
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, India.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2423-2424. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16480-6. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
This article discusses the limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) content detectors, citing studies by Flitcroft et al. The author shares personal experiences in which AI detectors incorrectly flagged human-written content, emphasizing that the influence of AI on writing styles is becoming more pronounced. As AI becomes integrated into writing, a market for "humanizing" AI-generated content is emerging, raising concerns about the balance between innovation and academic standards. The article calls for a shift away from AI detection toward evaluating the quality of ideas, urging stronger peer review and clear guidelines for the role of AI in academic writing.
本文讨论了人工智能（AI）内容检测器的局限性，并引用了弗利克罗夫特等人的研究。作者分享了个人经历，其中人工智能检测器错误地标记了人工撰写的内容，强调人工智能对写作风格的影响正变得更加明显。随着人工智能融入写作，一个“使人工智能生成的内容人性化”的市场正在兴起，这引发了人们对创新与学术标准之间平衡的担忧。文章呼吁从人工智能检测转向评估思想质量，敦促加强同行评审，并为人工智能在学术写作中的作用制定明确的指导方针。
