Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan, China.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0310297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310297. eCollection 2024.
To systematically appraise, compare, and summarize the measurement properties of intimate partner violence screening instruments for the general population and provide recommendations.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and EBSCO Psychology Behavioral Sciences Collection from their establishment to March 2024 using systematic search strategies. The methodological quality of the instruments that met the inclusion criteria and their measurement properties were assessed using the COSMIN methodology, and the COSMIN recommendations were followed. We reported this study using PRISMA 2020 checklist.
A total of 23 studies were eventually included, and 18 instruments were identified. The evaluation of the methodological quality indicates poor content validity but good structural validity; however, that of the criterion validity in most of the studies was inadequate. Measurement error and responsiveness were not assessed. Four screening instruments could be used in the interim. The remaining 14 instruments were not recommended for use.
The overall methodological quality of most of the assessed instruments was insufficient. A rigorous intimate partner violence screening instrument with good measurement properties is urgently required to identify and screen for intimate partner violence in the general population.
CRD42022365247.
系统评价、比较和总结一般人群亲密伴侣暴力筛查工具的测量特性，并提供建议。
我们使用系统搜索策略，从建库至 2024 年 3 月，在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 和 EBSCO 心理学行为科学收藏库中进行了检索。采用 COSMIN 方法学评估符合纳入标准的工具的方法学质量及其测量特性，并遵循 COSMIN 建议。我们使用 PRISMA 2020 清单报告了这项研究。
最终共纳入 23 项研究，确定了 18 种工具。方法学质量评估表明内容效度较差，但结构效度较好；然而，大多数研究的效标关联度评估结果欠佳。未评估测量误差和反应度。有 4 种筛查工具可在临时阶段使用。其余 14 种工具不建议使用。
评估工具的总体方法学质量大多不足。迫切需要一种具有良好测量特性的严格亲密伴侣暴力筛查工具，以识别和筛查一般人群中的亲密伴侣暴力。
PROSPERO 编号：CRD42022365247。
