Majernick T G, Bieniek R, Houston J B, Hughes H G
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Apr;15(4):417-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80178-0.
We measured cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation in 16 anesthetized patients without neck injury. Comparisons were made using straight and curved laryngoscope blades without stabilization, Philadelphia collar stabilization, and in-line stabilization by an assistant. There was cervical spine movement in all cases. There was no significant difference in movement without stabilization when comparing straight and curved laryngoscope blades (P = .8536). There was no significant decrease in movement when a Philadelphia collar was applied (P = 1.000). There was a significant decrease in movement when in-line stabilization was applied (P = 0.0056). Although none of the methods tested totally prevented cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation, the least movement was obtained by the use of in-line stabilization by an assistant. The type of laryngoscope blade used or application of a Philadelphia collar did not reduce movement significantly.
我们对16例无颈部损伤的麻醉患者在经口气管插管期间的颈椎活动情况进行了测量。比较了使用无固定措施的直喉镜和弯喉镜、费城颈托固定以及助手进行的轴向固定时的情况。所有病例均出现了颈椎活动。比较直喉镜和弯喉镜在无固定措施时的活动情况,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.8536)。应用费城颈托时活动情况无显著减少(P = 1.000)。应用轴向固定时活动情况显著减少(P = 0.0056)。尽管所测试的方法均不能完全防止经口气管插管期间的颈椎活动,但通过助手进行轴向固定获得的活动最少。所使用的喉镜类型或应用费城颈托均未显著减少活动。