Suppr超能文献

关节内注射皮质类固醇与富血小板血浆治疗颈椎小关节源性疼痛的随机临床试验

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Allison David J, Ebrahimzadeh Sanam, Muise Stephanie, Joseph Steven, Roa Agudelo Alexandria, Lawson Arden, Billias Nicole, Tran John, Smith Ashley, Loh Eldon

机构信息

Lawson Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105889.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study's primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections versus corticosteroid injections for the treatment of cervical facetogenic pain. Secondary aims were to compare self-rated disability, pain self-efficacy, and the safety of the procedure between groups.

METHODS

A single-site randomized double-blind controlled trial with 40 participants assigned to receive either leucocyte-poor, low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma injections or corticosteroid injection without local anesthetic into the cervical facet joint under fluoroscopy. Outcomes were collected via telephone at 1, 3, and 6 months to determine treatment effectiveness.

RESULTS

Low-concentrate platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections had similar effects on cervical facetogenic pain intensity over a 6-month period post injection as demonstrated by a non-significant group-by-time interaction for Numeric Rating Scale scores (p>0.05). However, both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in cervical facetogenic pain intensity 1 month post treatment compared with baseline (p=0.02), while the platelet-rich plasma group also demonstrated a clinically significant decrease in pain intensity at the same time point. There was a significant interaction at 1 month post intervention for pain self-efficacy (p=0.04), with the platelet-rich plasma injection group showing a larger increase in pain self-efficacy compared with the corticosteroid injection group. No significant interaction was observed for self-rated disability; however, significant reductions were shown at 3 and 6 months post treatment compared with baseline in both groups (p<0.01). No significant differences between groups were reported for adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported significantly less procedural pain (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Both platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injections induced similar improvements in cervical facetogenic pain intensity (1 month post) and self-rated disability (3 and 6 months post). Pain self-efficacy demonstrated a significant interaction with platelet-rich plasma injection showing greater improvement 1 month post. Additionally, both treatments exhibited a similar low prevalence of adverse events; however, those receiving platelet-rich plasma injection reported less procedural pain.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较关节腔内注射富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗颈椎小关节源性疼痛的有效性。次要目的是比较两组之间的自评残疾程度、疼痛自我效能感以及该治疗方法的安全性。

方法

一项单中心随机双盲对照试验,40名参与者被分配接受低白细胞、低浓度富血小板血浆注射或在透视引导下向颈椎小关节内注射不含局部麻醉剂的皮质类固醇。在1、3和6个月时通过电话收集结果以确定治疗效果。

结果

注射后6个月内,低浓度富血小板血浆和皮质类固醇注射对颈椎小关节源性疼痛强度的影响相似,数字评定量表评分的组间时间交互作用无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,与基线相比,两组在治疗后1个月时颈椎小关节源性疼痛强度均有统计学意义的降低(p=0.02),而富血小板血浆组在同一时间点的疼痛强度也有临床意义的降低。干预后1个月时疼痛自我效能感有显著交互作用(p=0.04),富血小板血浆注射组的疼痛自我效能感较皮质类固醇注射组有更大提高。自评残疾程度未观察到显著交互作用;然而,与基线相比,两组在治疗后3个月和6个月时均有显著降低(p<0.01)。两组不良事件报告无显著差异;然而,接受富血小板血浆注射者报告的操作疼痛明显较轻(p=0.02)。

结论

富血小板血浆和皮质类固醇注射在颈椎小关节源性疼痛强度(治疗后1个月)和自评残疾程度(治疗后3个月和6个月)方面均有相似改善。疼痛自我效能感与富血小板血浆注射有显著交互作用,显示治疗后1个月时有更大改善。此外,两种治疗方法的不良事件发生率均较低;然而,接受富血小板血浆注射者报告的操作疼痛较轻。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验