• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其穆斯林宗教官员对男性割礼的知识与态度评估

Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Muslim Religious Officials Regarding Male Circumcision: The Case of Turkey.

作者信息

Beyoğlu Muhammed Mustafa, Kaya Erhan, Üçer Hüseyin, Şahin Musa, Solak Yavuzalp, Erdoğan Ayşegül

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Onikişubat Health Directorate, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.

Department of Public Health, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2025 Apr;64(2):1159-1172. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02187-1. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10943-024-02187-1
PMID:39542980
Abstract

This study was aimed at evaluating the knowledge and attitudes of religious officials in Turkey about circumcision. Among the Imams, 96.7% (n = 234) were married, and 91.3% (n = 221) had male children. The place of circumcision was at home in 42.1% (n = 102), and 56.1% (n = 123) of the performers were not licensed physicians. Overall, 59.1% of the Imams believed that circumcision provided protection against HIV, 49.6% believed it reduced the risk of penile cancer, and 69.8% believed that circumcision increased sexual potency. Our research reveals that Imams in Turkey lack knowledge about circumcision.

摘要

本研究旨在评估土耳其宗教官员对包皮环切术的知识和态度。在伊玛目中,96.7%(n = 234)已婚,91.3%(n = 221)有儿子。42.1%(n = 102)的包皮环切术在家庭中进行,56.1%(n = 123)的实施者不是有执照的医生。总体而言,59.1%的伊玛目认为包皮环切术能预防艾滋病毒,49.6%认为能降低阴茎癌风险,69.8%认为包皮环切术能增强性能力。我们的研究表明,土耳其的伊玛目缺乏关于包皮环切术的知识。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Muslim Religious Officials Regarding Male Circumcision: The Case of Turkey.土耳其穆斯林宗教官员对男性割礼的知识与态度评估
J Relig Health. 2025 Apr;64(2):1159-1172. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02187-1. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
The View of Religious Officials on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the Zeytinburnu District of Istanbul.伊斯坦布尔泽廷布尔努区宗教官员对器官捐赠与移植的看法
J Relig Health. 2015 Dec;54(6):1975-85.
3
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Imams on Prostate Cancer in Kahramanmaras, Turkey.土耳其哈塔伊省伊玛目对前列腺癌的认知、态度和行为。
J Relig Health. 2022 Dec;61(6):4420-4432. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01592-8. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Religious officials' knowledge, attitude, and behavior towards smoking and the new tobacco law in Kahramanmaras, Turkey.土耳其哈塔伊省宗教官员对吸烟和新烟草法的知识、态度和行为。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 28;11:602. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-602.
5
Knowledge, attitude and behaviour of boys and parents about circumcision.男孩及其父母对割礼的知识、态度和行为。
Acta Paediatr. 2013 Apr;102(4):e169-73. doi: 10.1111/apa.12152. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
6
Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of mosque imams regarding organ donation.清真寺伊玛目关于器官捐赠的知识、态度和行为。
Ann Transplant. 2014 Nov 17;19:598-603. doi: 10.12659/AOT.891370.
7
Attitudes and behaviors regarding organ donation: a study on officials of religion in Turkey.对器官捐献的态度和行为:土耳其宗教官员的一项研究。
J Relig Health. 2013 Jun;52(2):439-49. doi: 10.1007/s10943-011-9490-8.
8
Religion, Culture, and Autopsy: A Survey With Muslim Religious Officials.宗教、文化与尸检:对穆斯林宗教官员的一项调查
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019 Dec;40(4):347-350. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000507.
9
Islam and the Urinary Stoma: A Contemporary Theological and Urological Dilemma.伊斯兰教与尿路造口术:当代神学与泌尿学的困境。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Mar;5(2):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Planning and evaluating strategies for AIDS health education interventions in the Muslim community in Uganda.乌干达穆斯林社区艾滋病健康教育干预措施的规划与评估策略
AIDS Educ Prev. 1995 Feb;7(1):10-21.

本文引用的文献

1
Religious circumcision (Khatna) and circumcision mishaps in Kashmiri children.宗教割礼(割礼)和克什米尔儿童割礼事故。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;19(4):213-216. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_158_21.
2
Is Circumcision "Necessary" in Islam? A Philosophical Argument Based on Peer Disagreement.伊斯兰教中的割礼是否“必要”?基于同行分歧的哲学论证。
J Relig Health. 2022 Dec;61(6):4871-4886. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01635-0. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors of Imams on Prostate Cancer in Kahramanmaras, Turkey.
土耳其哈塔伊省伊玛目对前列腺癌的认知、态度和行为。
J Relig Health. 2022 Dec;61(6):4420-4432. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01592-8. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
4
Non-therapeutic male circumcision in infancy or childhood and risk of human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections: national cohort study in Denmark.婴儿期或儿童期非治疗性男性割礼与人类免疫缺陷病毒和其他性传播感染的风险:丹麦全国队列研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;37(3):251-259. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00809-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
5
The Contrasting Evidence Concerning the Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Function, Sensation, and Pleasure: A Systematic Review.关于男性包皮环切术对性功能、感觉和快感影响的对比证据:一项系统评价。
Sex Med. 2020 Dec;8(4):577-598. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Publication Productivity of Countries in Circumcision: A Comprehensive Bibliometric View.宗教信仰对割礼国家发表论文生产力的影响:综合文献计量学视角
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):1126-1136. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-00985-x.
7
Muslim mothers mainly saw circumcision in terms of religion or tradition but wanted it to be carried out medical professionals.穆斯林母亲主要从宗教或传统的角度看待割礼,但希望由医学专业人员来进行。
Acta Paediatr. 2020 Feb;109(2):396-403. doi: 10.1111/apa.15105. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
8
Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status.热灼环切术的可靠性:对社会经济地位较低国家自愿进行的环切术的回顾性分析
Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Oct 13;11:1756287219882598. doi: 10.1177/1756287219882598. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
9
Educating Religious Leaders Increases Male Circumcision Rates in Tanzania.对宗教领袖进行培训可提高坦桑尼亚的男性包皮环切率。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1517. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3828.
10
CDC's Male Circumcision Recommendations Represent a Key Public Health Measure.美国疾病预防控制中心的男性割礼建议代表了一项关键的公共卫生措施。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Mar 28;5(1):15-27. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00390. Print 2017 Mar 24.