Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Euro Surveill. 2024 Nov;29(46). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.46.2400156.
BackgroundNon-university hospitals are the major provider of inpatient care in Germany, serving 89% of acute care hospital beds. Although surveillance data on antimicrobial use in hospitals are widely available, data on prescription quality are rare.AimWe aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescribing patterns and quality in southwest German non-university hospitals.MethodsDuring 2021, we performed three point prevalence surveys (PPS) in 10 non-university hospitals, representing ca 10% of hospital beds in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg (11 million inhabitants). Demographic and clinical information were collected. We assessed the overall performance of 14 validated process quality indicators (QI) covering infection diagnostics, antimicrobial therapy and documentation.ResultsOf 8,560 patients analysed, 2,861 (33%) received at least one antimicrobial. Most (2,789, 80%) antimicrobial prescriptions were for therapeutic indications. Most frequently prescribed agents were beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (1,120, 40%) in therapeutic and cefuroxime (269, 37%) in prophylactic indications. According to the World Health Organization's Access, Watch, Reserve classification, the Access-to-Watch ratio was 0.73. Overall adherence to QIs was low and varied substantially (27-93%), with documentation, possible streamlining and switching to oral therapy exhibiting the lowest fulfilment rates (< 50%).ConclusionThe results indicate a need to improve antimicrobial prescribing quality in non-university hospitals. The high prevalence of antimicrobial use in our setting underlines the demand for sustainable antimicrobial stewardship programmes in this sector. Our QI-based PPS approach can be used to identify key targets for future antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The results indicate a need for further legislation on antimicrobial stewardship.
背景
非大学医院是德国住院治疗的主要提供者,提供了 89%的急性护理医院床位。尽管有关医院中抗菌药物使用的监测数据广泛可用,但处方质量数据却很少。
目的
我们旨在深入分析德国西南部非大学医院的抗菌药物处方模式和质量。
方法
在 2021 年,我们在 10 家非大学医院进行了三次点患病率调查(PPS),这些医院代表巴登-符腾堡州(1100 万居民)约 10%的医院床位。收集了人口统计学和临床信息。我们评估了涵盖感染诊断,抗菌治疗和记录的 14 个经过验证的过程质量指标(QI)的总体表现。
结果
在分析的 8560 名患者中,有 2861 名(33%)至少接受了一种抗菌药物治疗。大多数(2789 名,80%)抗菌药物处方是出于治疗原因。最常开的药物是β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(1120 名,40%)用于治疗和头孢呋辛(269 名,37%)用于预防。根据世界卫生组织的获取、监测、储备分类,获取-监测比为 0.73。总体上,QI 的遵守率较低且差异很大(27-93%),记录、可能的简化和转为口服治疗的符合率最低(<50%)。
结论
结果表明,非大学医院需要提高抗菌药物处方质量。我们研究中抗菌药物使用的高流行率强调了该部门需要可持续的抗菌药物管理计划。我们基于 QI 的 PPS 方法可用于确定未来抗菌药物管理干预的关键目标。结果表明需要进一步制定抗菌药物管理方面的立法。