Hibino Tokimitsu, Okui Yusuke, Kondo Satoko, Ogura Fumiko, Toba Yoshie
Department of Anesthesiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 14;16(10):e71435. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71435. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The central venous catheter (CVC) has been in clinical use for more than half a century. It was initially used for total parenteral nutrition. However, its indication gradually expanded to chemotherapy, intensive care, anesthesia, and other areas. As the application of CVCs increased, complications also increased. Nevertheless, some guidelines for CVC insertion have been implemented, and clinicians worldwide are working hard to prevent complications during CVC insertion. However, the safety of CVC removal has not been given adequate attention. Because of a few reports on complications, such as air embolism and airway obstruction, clinicians are recognizing the potential risks associated with CVC. However, a few medical staff recognize the possibility of associated neurological complications. We herein report a case of a patient who underwent anesthesia for the removal of a CVC, which was inadvertently inserted in the epidural space. The catheter was used to monitor central venous pressure and as a route for medicine administration before the recognition of its abnormal position. Although the distal luminal wave pattern was similar to that of a normal central venous line, heparin did not exert its expected effect after administration from the distal lumen. Conversely, appropriate blood pressure responses were observed following the administration of inotropic agents from the proximal lumen. Objective neurological monitoring was required for removal because of the involvement of general anesthesia. After general anesthesia induction, the surrounding tissue of the CVC was dissected toward the deep layer of the neck. Arterial bleeding occurred immediately after removal. After 33 minutes, the motor-evoked potential (MEP) waves deteriorated. Angiography showed bleeding from the left vertebral artery into the spinal canal. Consequently, emergency coil embolization of the left vertebral artery was performed, followed by emergency laminectomy to decompress the spinal canal. All procedures were completed, and the MEP waves completely recovered. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged after 17 days. In this case report, we discuss the appropriate removal steps for a CVC inadvertently placed in the epidural space.
中心静脉导管(CVC)已在临床使用了半个多世纪。它最初用于全胃肠外营养。然而,其适应证逐渐扩展到化疗、重症监护、麻醉及其他领域。随着CVC应用的增加,并发症也增多了。尽管如此,已实施了一些CVC置入指南,全球的临床医生都在努力预防CVC置入过程中的并发症。然而,CVC拔除的安全性尚未得到足够重视。由于有一些关于空气栓塞和气道阻塞等并发症的报道,临床医生开始认识到与CVC相关的潜在风险。然而,只有少数医务人员认识到存在相关神经并发症的可能性。我们在此报告一例患者,该患者在拔除意外置入硬膜外间隙的CVC时接受了麻醉。在识别出其异常位置之前,该导管用于监测中心静脉压并作为给药途径。尽管远端管腔的波形与正常中心静脉导管相似,但从远端管腔给药后肝素并未发挥预期效果。相反,从近端管腔给予血管活性药物后观察到了适当的血压反应。由于涉及全身麻醉,拔除时需要进行客观的神经监测。全身麻醉诱导后,向颈部深层解剖CVC周围组织。拔除后立即发生动脉出血。33分钟后,运动诱发电位(MEP)波恶化。血管造影显示左椎动脉出血进入椎管。因此,对左椎动脉进行了紧急弹簧圈栓塞,随后进行了紧急椎板切除术以减压椎管。所有操作均完成,MEP波完全恢复。术后病程顺利,患者17天后出院。在本病例报告中,我们讨论了意外置入硬膜外间隙的CVC的适当拔除步骤。