Suppr超能文献

同时记录的同侧、对侧和双耳短纯音刺激诱发的听觉诱发磁场与电位之间的比较。

Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation.

作者信息

Pantev C, Lütkenhöner B, Hoke M, Lehnertz K

出版信息

Audiology. 1986;25(1):54-61. doi: 10.3109/00206098609078369.

Abstract

Both auditory-evoked magnetic fields (AEMF) and auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) mainly consist of three peaks with latencies of about 50, 100 and 160 ms. Comparison of responses to ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural stimulation yields no significant amplitude or latency differences of the AEP peaks whereas the simultaneously recorded AEMF peaks exhibit a 10 ms shorter latency and an approximately 38% greater amplitude for contralateral versus ipsilateral stimulation. This fact can be due to differences in the strength, location (especially the depth) and the direction of the dipole source, and a decision cannot be made considering the data recorded from just one position. Another finding is that binaural stimulation reduces the peak amplitudes by approximately 25% compared with contralateral stimulation. This result indicates some kind of interference between the ipsilateral and contralateral pathways ('binaural interaction').

摘要

听觉诱发磁场(AEMF)和听觉诱发电位(AEP)主要都由三个峰值组成,潜伏期约为50、100和160毫秒。对同侧、对侧和双耳刺激的反应比较显示,AEP峰值的幅度或潜伏期没有显著差异,而同时记录的AEMF峰值在对侧刺激与同侧刺激相比时,潜伏期短10毫秒,幅度大约大38%。这一事实可能是由于偶极子源的强度、位置(特别是深度)和方向不同造成的,仅根据从一个位置记录的数据无法做出判断。另一个发现是,与对侧刺激相比,双耳刺激使峰值幅度降低了约25%。这一结果表明同侧和对侧通路之间存在某种干扰(“双耳相互作用”)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验