Grantham B D, Zammit V A
Biochem J. 1986 Jan 15;233(2):589-93. doi: 10.1042/bj2330589.
The active site of the overt activity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT I) in rat liver mitochondria was blocked by the self-catalysed formation of the S-carboxypalmitoyl-CoA ester of (-)-carnitine, followed by washing of the mitochondria. CPT I activity in treated mitochondria was inhibited by 90-95%. Binding of [14C]malonyl-CoA to these mitochondria was not inhibited as compared with that of control mitochondria. When CPT I activity was inhibited, palmitoyl-CoA could markedly displace [14C]malonyl-CoA binding from the low-affinity site for the inhibitor [Zammit, Corstorphine & Gray (1984) Biochem. J. 222, 335-342], but not from the high-affinity site for malonyl-CoA binding. The saturation characteristics of the malonyl-CoA-binding component lost in the presence of palmitoyl-CoA were sigmoidal, and thus suggestive of co-operative binding at this site. It is suggested that the site hitherto considered to be a low-affinity malonyl-CoA-binding site may be effectively a second, allosteric, acyl-CoA-binding site on CPT I under conditions that prevail in vivo, whereas the high-affinity site for malonyl-CoA may be exclusive to the inhibitor. The possibility that the competitive-type interactions of malonyl-CoA and acyl-CoA on CPT I activity could arise from the effects of separate malonyl-CoA and acyl-CoA allosteric sites is considered. The possible significance of the large difference in the capacity of the two sites and their different saturation kinetics is also discussed.
肉碱棕榈酰转移酶(CPT I)在大鼠肝脏线粒体中的活性位点因左旋肉碱的S - 羧基棕榈酰 - CoA酯的自催化形成而被阻断,随后对线粒体进行洗涤。处理后的线粒体中CPT I活性受到90 - 95%的抑制。与对照线粒体相比,[14C]丙二酸单酰 - CoA与这些线粒体的结合未受抑制。当CPT I活性被抑制时,棕榈酰 - CoA可显著取代抑制剂[扎米特、科斯托芬和格雷(1984年)《生物化学杂志》222卷,335 - 342页]低亲和力位点上的[14C]丙二酸单酰 - CoA结合,但不能取代丙二酸单酰 - CoA高亲和力位点上的结合。在棕榈酰 - CoA存在下丧失的丙二酸单酰 - CoA结合成分的饱和特性呈S形,因此表明该位点存在协同结合。有人认为,迄今被认为是低亲和力丙二酸单酰 - CoA结合位点的部位,在体内普遍存在的条件下,实际上可能是CPT I上的第二个变构酰基辅酶A结合位点,而丙二酸单酰 - CoA的高亲和力位点可能只为抑制剂所特有。考虑了丙二酸单酰 - CoA和酰基辅酶A对CPT I活性的竞争型相互作用可能源于单独的丙二酸单酰 - CoA和酰基辅酶A变构位点的影响这一可能性。还讨论了两个位点容量的巨大差异及其不同饱和动力学的可能意义。