Gururangan Kapil, Kozak Richard, Dorriz Parshaw J
Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence Mission Medical Center, Mission Viejo, CA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, UCI School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Jan;34(1):108116. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108116. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
Seizures are both a common mimic and a potential complication of acute stroke. Although EEG can be helpful to evaluate this differential diagnosis, conventional EEG infrastructure is resource-intensive and unable to provide timely monitoring to match the emergent context of a stroke code. We aimed to evaluate the real-world use and utility of a point-of-care EEG device as an adjunct to acute stroke evaluation.
We performed a retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary care community teaching hospital by identifying patients who underwent point-of-care EEG monitoring using Rapid Response EEG system (Ceribell Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) during stroke code evaluation of acute neurological deficits during the study period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. We assessed the frequency of seizures and highly epileptiform patterns among patients with either confirmed strokes or stroke mimics.
Point-of-care EEG monitoring was used in the wake of a stroke code in 70 patients. Of these, neuroimaging and clinical information resulted in a diagnosis of stroke in 38 patients (28 ischemic, 6 hemorrhagic, 4 transient ischemic attack; median NIHSS score of 6.5 [IQR 2.0-12.0]) and absence of any stroke in 32 patients. Point-of-care EEG detected seizures and highly epileptiform patterns in 6 (15.8 %) stroke patients and 11 (34.4 %) stroke-mimic patients, including 2 patients with persistent expressive aphasia due to repeated focal seizures.
Point-of-care EEG has utility for detecting nonconvulsive seizures in patients undergoing acute stroke evaluations.
癫痫发作既是急性卒中常见的模仿症状,也是其潜在并发症。虽然脑电图有助于评估这种鉴别诊断,但传统脑电图设备资源密集,无法在卒中急救的紧急情况下提供及时监测。我们旨在评估即时护理脑电图设备在急性卒中评估中的实际应用及效用。
我们在一家三级医疗社区教学医院进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究,确定在2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日研究期间,在急性神经功能缺损的卒中急救评估中使用快速反应脑电图系统(Ceribell公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)进行即时护理脑电图监测的患者。我们评估了确诊为卒中或疑似卒中患者的癫痫发作频率和高度癫痫样模式。
70例患者在卒中急救后接受了即时护理脑电图监测。其中,神经影像学和临床信息确诊38例患者为卒中(28例缺血性卒中、6例出血性卒中、4例短暂性脑缺血发作;美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分中位数为6.5[四分位间距2.0 - 12.0]),32例患者未发现任何卒中迹象。即时护理脑电图在6例(15.8%)卒中患者和11例(34.4%)疑似卒中患者中检测到癫痫发作和高度癫痫样模式,包括2例因反复局灶性癫痫发作导致持续性表达性失语的患者。
即时护理脑电图在急性卒中评估患者中对于检测非惊厥性癫痫发作具有效用。