Temido Maria José, Peixinho Margarida, Cunha Rosário, Silva Andrea, Lopes Sandra, Mendes Sofia, Ferreira Ana Margarida, Ferreira Manuela, Figueiredo Pedro, Portela Francisco
Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Clinical Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Med Clin (Barc). 2025 Feb 28;164(4):168-172. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
An ideal test to evaluate the inflammatory burden in ulcerative colitis is still an unmet need. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have significant limitations. Plasma calprotectin (PC) seems to be promising in inflammatory diseases, but its value in IBD is still to be determined. Our aim was to assess whether PC correlates with inflammatory activity in UC.
Prospective single center cohort study. Consecutive patients previously diagnosed with UC undergoing endoscopy were included (June 2021-September 2022). Demographic, clinical, analytical (CRP, PC and FCP), endoscopic and histologic data was collected at the time of colonoscopy. PC was assessed with Gentian Calprotectin Immunoassay and, in a subgroup of patients, also with QUANTA Flash Circulating Calprotectin from INOVA.
Inclusion of 98 patients (60.2% male) with a median age 49 (38-61) years. The extent of colitis was distal in 12 (12.2%), left-sided in 49 (50%), and extensive in 37 (37.8%). Mesalazine was taken by 65 (66.3%) patients, with biologic monotherapy used in 24 (24.5%) and combination therapy in 6 (6.1%). Clinical, endoscopic and histological remission were detected, in 56 (57.1%), 48 (49%) and in 55 (56.1%) patients, respectively. Comparing MES 0/1 vs MES 2/3, a statistically significant difference was found with PC, CRP and FCP. Concerning endoscopic (MES=1) and histological (GS<2) remission, FCP was the only biomarker able to detect these outcomes. PC (Gentian) and PCi (INOVA) were highly correlated with CRP.
PC has low value in distinguishing patients in remission from patients with endoscopic or histologic activity in UC. This essential role must continue be played by FCP.
评估溃疡性结肠炎炎症负担的理想检测方法仍有待满足。粪便钙卫蛋白(FCP)和C反应蛋白(CRP)存在显著局限性。血浆钙卫蛋白(PC)在炎症性疾病中似乎很有前景,但其在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的价值仍有待确定。我们的目的是评估PC是否与溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的炎症活动相关。
前瞻性单中心队列研究。纳入此前诊断为UC并接受内镜检查的连续患者(2021年6月至2022年9月)。在结肠镜检查时收集人口统计学、临床、分析(CRP、PC和FCP)、内镜及组织学数据。PC采用龙胆钙卫蛋白免疫测定法评估,在部分患者亚组中还采用了INOVA的QUANTA Flash循环钙卫蛋白法进行评估。
纳入98例患者(男性占60.2%),中位年龄49(38 - 61)岁。结肠炎范围为远端型12例(12.2%)、左侧型49例(50%)、广泛型37例(37.8%)。65例(66.3%)患者服用美沙拉嗪,24例(24.5%)采用生物制剂单药治疗,6例(6.1%)采用联合治疗。分别有56例(57.1%)、48例(49%)和55例(56.1%)患者实现临床、内镜及组织学缓解。比较MES 0/1与MES 2/3时,发现PC、CRP和FCP存在统计学显著差异。关于内镜(MES = 1)和组织学(GS < 2)缓解,FCP是唯一能够检测到这些结果的生物标志物。PC(龙胆法)和PCi(INOVA法)与CRP高度相关。
在区分UC缓解期患者与内镜或组织学活动期患者方面,PC价值较低。这一关键作用仍必须由FCP来发挥。