• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立健全、适度且及时的数字心理健康技术监管与评估方法。

Building robust, proportionate, and timely approaches to regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.

作者信息

Hopkin Gareth, Branson Richard, Campbell Paul, Coole Holly, Cooper Sophie, Edelmann Francesca, Gatera Grace, Morgan Jamie, Salmon Mark

机构信息

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK.

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Digit Health. 2025 Jan;7(1):e89-e93. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00215-2. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00215-2
PMID:39550311
Abstract

Demand for mental health services exceeds available resources globally, and access to diagnosis and evidence-based treatment is affected by long delays. Digital mental health technologies present an opportunity to reimagine the delivery of mental health support by providing innovative, effective, and tailored approaches that meet people's individual preferences and goals. These technologies also present new challenges, however, and efforts must be made to ensure they are safe and effective. The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have launched a partnership, funded by Wellcome, that explores regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies. This Viewpoint describes a series of key challenges across the regulatory and health technology assessment pathways and aims to facilitate discussions to ensure that approaches to regulation and evaluation are informed by patients, the public, and professionals working within mental health. We invite partners from across the mental health community to engage with, collaborate with, and provide scrutiny of this project to ensure it delivers the best possible outcomes.

摘要

全球范围内,心理健康服务的需求超过了现有资源,诊断和循证治疗的可及性受到长期延误的影响。数字心理健康技术提供了创新、有效且量身定制的方法,以满足人们的个人偏好和目标,从而为重新构想心理健康支持的提供方式带来了机遇。然而,这些技术也带来了新的挑战,必须努力确保其安全有效。英国药品和医疗产品监管局以及国家卫生与保健优化研究所发起了一项由惠康基金会资助的合作项目,该项目旨在探索对数字心理健康技术的监管和评估。本观点文章描述了监管和卫生技术评估路径中的一系列关键挑战,旨在推动相关讨论,以确保监管和评估方法能听取患者、公众以及心理健康领域专业人士的意见。我们邀请心理健康领域的各方合作伙伴参与、协作并审视该项目,以确保其能产生尽可能好的成果。

相似文献

1
Building robust, proportionate, and timely approaches to regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies.建立健全、适度且及时的数字心理健康技术监管与评估方法。
Lancet Digit Health. 2025 Jan;7(1):e89-e93. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00215-2. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Exploratory study from an end-of-life research partnership network to improve access for ethnically diverse communities in one region.一项来自临终关怀研究合作网络的探索性研究,旨在改善某一地区不同种族社区的医疗服务可及性。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 11:1-23. doi: 10.3310/MWHY5612.
3
Feasibility of in-home monitoring for people with glaucoma: the I-TRAC mixed-methods study.家庭监测青光眼患者的可行性:I-TRAC 混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(44):1-163. doi: 10.3310/GTWD6802.
4
Interventions to improve mental health and well-being in care-experienced children and young people aged less than 25: the CHIMES systematic review.改善25岁以下有照料经历的儿童和青少年心理健康与幸福感的干预措施:CHIMES系统评价
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec;12(14):1-124. doi: 10.3310/MKYP6299.
5
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
6
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.
7
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
8
UK medicines regulation: responding to current challenges.英国药品监管:应对当前挑战
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82(6):1471-1476. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13077. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Assessing the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Digital Technologies Used by Health Professionals in Supporting Obesity and Mental Health Communication: Scoping Review.评估医疗专业人员用于支持肥胖症和心理健康交流的数字技术的用途、益处及局限性:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 10;27:e58434. doi: 10.2196/58434.
10
Understanding stakeholder views of the use of digital therapeutic interventions within children and young people's mental health services.了解利益相关者对儿童和青少年心理健康服务中数字治疗干预措施使用情况的看法。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 11;16:1505345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1505345. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Is This Chatbot Safe and Evidence-Based? A Call for the Critical Evaluation of Generative AI Mental Health Chatbots.这个聊天机器人安全且基于证据吗?呼吁对生成式人工智能心理健康聊天机器人进行批判性评估。
J Particip Med. 2025 May 29;17:e69534. doi: 10.2196/69534.
2
Stakeholder perceptions on institutional design of digital health regulatory frameworks: insights from Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda.利益相关者对数字健康监管框架制度设计的看法:来自肯尼亚、卢旺达和乌干达的见解
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025 May 9;3:oqaf010. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqaf010. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital mental health treatment implementation playbook: successful practices from implementation experiences in American healthcare organizations.
数字心理健康治疗实施手册:美国医疗保健机构实施经验中的成功做法
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 11;7:1509387. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1509387. eCollection 2025.
4
Toward a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Mental Health Technologies: Scoping Review.迈向数字心理健康技术的新概念框架:范围综述。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 19;12:e63484. doi: 10.2196/63484.