• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mehrviru 和 Sacace 在 HPV 分子检测中的有效性:潜在类别分析。

Validity of Mehrviru and Sacace in molecular detection of HPV: a latent class analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Reproductive Endocrinology Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1309. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10121-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-10121-9
PMID:39550529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Valid diagnostic tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection are crucial to identify individuals at high risk of cervical cancer. We assessed and compared the validity of Mehrviru HPV genotyping and Sacace (HPV Genotypes 14 Real-TM Quant) for molecular detection of 14 high-risk human papillomaviruses.

METHODS

We used three HPV test results to identify HPV-positive individuals (14 high-risk genotypes) in a specialist gynecology clinic. The HPV test results were collected using Mehrviru, Sacace, and a third kit from the clinical diagnostic laboratory. We used Latent class analysis to determine the actual status of HPV infection in study participants. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, Youden, and area under the ROC curve indices of each diagnostic kit and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The agreement between the Mehrviru and Sacace kits was determined using the Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

We examined 117 women at high risk of HPV infection. The mean age (SD) was 37.2 (9.1). According to LCA, 28.6% of participants had an HPV infection. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the Mehrviru were 90.8% (73.7-97.2%) and 90.9% (82.1-95.6%), and corresponding figures for Sacace were 92.0% (72.3-98.1%) and 97.4% (90.2-99.3%). The kappa index between the Mehrviru and Sacace kits was 69.7% (55.6-83.9%). The area under the ROC curve for Mehrviru and Sacace test were 91.4% (85.7-97.1%) and 94.4% (89.3-99.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is an excellent agreement between Mehrviru and Sacace test results, and the diagnostic accuracy indices were similar.

摘要

背景

有效的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测诊断试验对于识别宫颈癌高危个体至关重要。我们评估并比较了 Mehrviru HPV 基因分型和 Sacace(HPV 基因型 14 Real-TM Quant)在分子检测 14 种高危人乳头瘤病毒中的有效性。

方法

我们使用三种 HPV 检测结果在一家妇科专科诊所中确定 HPV 阳性个体(14 种高危基因型)。HPV 检测结果使用 Mehrviru、Sacace 和临床诊断实验室的第三种试剂盒收集。我们使用潜在类别分析来确定研究参与者的 HPV 感染实际状况。计算了每种诊断试剂盒及其 95%置信区间的灵敏度、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性似然比、Youden 和 ROC 曲线下面积指数。使用 Kappa 统计确定 Mehrviru 和 Sacace 试剂盒之间的一致性。

结果

我们检查了 117 名 HPV 感染高危女性。平均年龄(SD)为 37.2(9.1)岁。根据 LCA,28.6%的参与者存在 HPV 感染。Mehrviru 的灵敏度和特异性(95%CI)分别为 90.8%(73.7-97.2%)和 90.9%(82.1-95.6%),Sacace 的相应数值分别为 92.0%(72.3-98.1%)和 97.4%(90.2-99.3%)。Mehrviru 和 Sacace 试剂盒之间的 Kappa 指数为 69.7%(55.6-83.9%)。Mehrviru 和 Sacace 检测的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 91.4%(85.7-97.1%)和 94.4%(89.3-99.5%)。

结论

Mehrviru 和 Sacace 检测结果之间存在极好的一致性,且诊断准确性指数相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202f/11569601/2f8881234dac/12879_2024_10121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202f/11569601/2f8881234dac/12879_2024_10121_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/202f/11569601/2f8881234dac/12879_2024_10121_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of Mehrviru and Sacace in molecular detection of HPV: a latent class analysis.Mehrviru 和 Sacace 在 HPV 分子检测中的有效性:潜在类别分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1309. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10121-9.
2
The Sansure® Human Papillomavirus DNA Diagnostic Kit offers excellent reproducibility performance for the detection of high-risk HPV.三优实®人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)核酸检测试剂盒(PCR-荧光探针法)重复性好,可用于高危型 HPV 的检测。
J Med Virol. 2024 Oct;96(10):e29961. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29961.
3
Comparison of the analytical and clinical performance of five tests for the detection of human papillomavirus genital infection.五种检测人乳头瘤病毒生殖器感染的检测方法的分析性能与临床性能比较。
J Virol Methods. 2017 Oct;248:238-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Clinical validation of the Cobas 4800 HPV assay using cervical samples in SurePath medium under the VALGENT4 framework.采用 VALGENT4 框架下的 SurePath 介质中的宫颈样本对 Cobas 4800 HPV 检测进行临床验证。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104336. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Detection and genotyping of HPV-DNA through different types of diagnostic platforms in liquid-based cervical-cytology samples.通过不同类型诊断平台对液基宫颈细胞学样本中的人乳头瘤病毒DNA进行检测和基因分型。
Pathologica. 2018 Dec;110(4):294-301.
6
Evaluation of the SureX HPV genotyping test for the detection of high-risk HPV in cervical cancer screening.SureX HPV 基因分型检测在宫颈癌筛查中检测高危型 HPV 的评估。
Virol J. 2020 Nov 9;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01417-8.
7
Anyplex II HPV test in detection and follow-up after surgical treatment of CIN2+ lesions.Anyplex II HPV 检测在 CIN2+病变手术后的检测和随访中的应用。
J Med Virol. 2021 Nov;93(11):6340-6346. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26862. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Evaluation of a Novel Single-Tube Method for Extended Genotyping of Human Papillomavirus.新型 HPV 延伸基因分型单管法的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Feb 22;56(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01687-17. Print 2018 Mar.
9
Sensitivity of APTIMA HPV E6/E7 mRNA test in comparison with hybrid capture 2 HPV DNA test for detection of high risk oncogenic human papillomavirus in 396 biopsy confirmed cervical cancers.APTIMA HPV E6/E7 mRNA 检测与杂交捕获 2 型 HPV DNA 检测在 396 例经活检证实的宫颈癌中检测高危型致癌人乳头瘤病毒的比较敏感性。
J Med Virol. 2016 Jul;88(7):1271-8. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24453. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
10
Clinical validation of the HPV-risk assay, a novel real-time PCR assay for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA by targeting the E7 region.人乳头瘤病毒风险检测法的临床验证,这是一种通过靶向E7区域来检测高危型人乳头瘤病毒DNA的新型实时聚合酶链反应检测法。
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Mar;52(3):890-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03195-13. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the cervical cancer elimination era: The 2021 HPV LabNet international proficiency study.在宫颈癌消除时代提高人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测水平:2021 年 HPV 实验室网络国际能力验证研究。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Sep;154:105237. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105237. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.宫颈癌筛查中的假阴性结果——风险、原因及对临床实践和公共卫生的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;12(6):1508. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061508.
3
Iranian women's psychological responses to positive HPV test result: a qualitative study.
伊朗女性 HPV 检测阳性结果的心理反应:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar 26;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01272-x.
4
Investigational approach to adenoviral conjunctivitis: comparison of three diagnostic tests using a Bayesian latent class model.腺病毒性结膜炎的研究方法:使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型对三种诊断测试的比较
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018 Jan 31;12(1):43-51. doi: 10.3855/jidc.9439.
5
Excess Cost of Cervical Cancer Screening Beyond Recommended Screening Ages or After Hysterectomy in a Single Institution.单家医疗机构中推荐的宫颈癌筛查年龄以外或子宫切除术后的宫颈癌筛查的额外成本。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018 Jul;22(3):184-188. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000400.
6
Prevalence and Genotype Distribution of HPV Infection in China: Analysis of 51,345 HPV Genotyping Results from China's Largest CAP Certified Laboratory.中国HPV感染的患病率及基因型分布:来自中国最大的CAP认证实验室的51345份HPV基因分型结果分析
J Cancer. 2016 May 25;7(9):1037-43. doi: 10.7150/jca.14971. eCollection 2016.
7
Evaluation of antiphospholipid antibody assays using latent class analysis to address the lack of a reference standard.使用潜在类别分析评估抗磷脂抗体检测方法以解决缺乏参考标准的问题。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Dec 1;54(12):1929-1937. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0116.
8
A Comparison of Three Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis.应用潜在类别分析比较三种腕管综合征诊断试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1958-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00476.
9
Human papillomaviruses in urological malignancies: a critical assessment.泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤中的人乳头瘤病毒:一项批判性评估。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):46.e19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.012. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
A systematic review of the prevalence of mucosal and cutaneous human papillomavirus types.黏膜和皮肤人乳头瘤病毒型别流行率的系统评价
Virology. 2013 Oct;445(1-2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Aug 5.