Pasetsky Jared, Bhatt Kishan, Kachnic Lisa A, Yu James B, Horowitz David P
Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025 Mar 15;121(4):871-874. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.063. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
Radiation oncologists are known to be burdened with prior authorization and insurance denials more than other medical specialties. This analysis sought to use publicly available data and determine whether Medicare Advantage plans are inappropriately denying radiation therapy (RT) services more than other health services.
Data from the Appeals Decision Search on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website were extracted from 2022 through June 2024. The data contain appeal decisions from a third-party independent review entity, which uses Medicare coverage guidelines to determine the appropriateness of a denial. Percentages of inappropriate denials were calculated for RT services and all health services. A chi-square test was used to compare inappropriate denial levels between RT and everything else. Decisions were also filtered by "keyword" and "condition" to analyze trends in treatment modalities and diagnosis, respectively.
RT services were inappropriately denied in 15.04%, 18.69%, and 16.01% of cases for 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively, while inappropriate denials for all health services were only 4.69%, 5.28%, and 3.44%, respectively. Overall, since 2022, 274 out of 1576 RT appeals were inappropriately denied (17.39%), while only 20,195 out of 433,788 total appeals were inappropriately denied for all health services (4.66%). The difference was statistically significant for all 3 years and for the entire time period, with all P values < .00001. Using keywords brachytherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, proton, and intensity-modulated RT, inappropriate denial rates varied at 12.75%, 26.11%, 13.02%, and 41.06%, respectively, from 2022 to 2024. Prostate cancer appeals for protons had particularly low rates of inappropriate denial at 3.45%, while breast cancer appeals for intensity-modulated RT had particularly high rates of inappropriate denial at 82.14%.
Medicare Advantage plans are inappropriately denying RT services more than non-RT services. These data warrant urgent policy changes to prevent Medicare-eligible patients from being inappropriately denied access to cancer treatments.
与其他医学专科相比,放射肿瘤学家面临的事先授权和保险拒付负担更重。本分析旨在利用公开数据,确定医疗保险优势计划对放射治疗(RT)服务的不当拒付是否比其他健康服务更多。
从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心网站的上诉决定搜索中提取2022年至2024年6月的数据。这些数据包含第三方独立审查实体的上诉决定,该实体使用医疗保险覆盖指南来确定拒付的适当性。计算RT服务和所有健康服务的不当拒付百分比。使用卡方检验比较RT与其他所有服务之间的不当拒付水平。还通过“关键词”和“病症”对决定进行筛选,分别分析治疗方式和诊断的趋势。
2022年、2023年和2024年,RT服务的不当拒付率分别为15.04%、18.69%和16.01%,而所有健康服务的不当拒付率分别仅为4.69%、5.28%和3.44%。总体而言,自2022年以来,1576起RT上诉中有274起被不当拒付(17.39%),而在433,788起所有健康服务的上诉中,只有20,195起被不当拒付(4.66%)。这一差异在所有3年以及整个时间段内均具有统计学意义,所有P值均<0.00001。使用关键词近距离放射治疗、立体定向体部放射治疗、质子和调强放疗,2022年至2024年的不当拒付率分别为12.75%、26.11%、13.02%和41.06%。前列腺癌质子治疗上诉的不当拒付率特别低,为3.45%,而乳腺癌调强放疗上诉的不当拒付率特别高,为82.14%。
医疗保险优势计划对RT服务的不当拒付比对非RT服务更多。这些数据需要紧急的政策变革,以防止符合医疗保险资格的患者被不当拒付癌症治疗。