• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区参与式研究中公平伙伴关系和权力分享的七个核心能力和条件。

Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research.

机构信息

Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK

BRAC University James P Grant School of Public Health, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 17;9(11):e015497. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015497.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015497
PMID:39551576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11574420/
Abstract

Equitable health research requires actively engaging communities in producing new knowledge to advocate for their health needs. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) relies on the coproduction of contextual and grounded knowledge between researchers, programme implementers and community partners with the aim of catalysing action for change. Improving coproduction competencies can support research quality and validity. Yet, frameworks and guidance highlighting the ideal competencies and conditions needed for all research partners to contribute meaningfully and equitably are lacking. This paper aims to advance CBPR by laying out seven core competencies and conditions that can promote power sharing in knowledge production, application and dissemination at the individual, community, organisational and systems levels.Competencies were developed through an iterative process, that synthesised pre-existing literature and frameworks with a wide range of tacit knowledge from researchers, activists, implementation partners and community researchers from Bangladesh, India, Kenya, Sierra Leone and the UK.The seven core competencies and conditions are: (1) capacity to interpret and respond to individual and relational identity, connection, uniqueness and inequities; (2) ability of communities and partners to work in the most suitable, inclusive and synergistic way; (3) aptitude for generating safe and inclusive spaces for multidirectional knowledge and skills exchange that goes beyond the research focus; (4) expertise in democratic leadership and/or facilitation to balance competing priorities and ensure shared decision-making; (5) capacity to analyse readiness for action, successes and areas for improvements throughout the research process; (6) ability to instigate sustainable change processes within the political dimensions of systems, policies and practices using advocacy, lobbying or activism approaches and (7) skills to interpret and disseminate findings and outputs that are understandable, respectful and promote community ownership. We present core competency and condition areas, individual and collective expertise associated with competencies, likely outcomes, examples of activities and sources of evidence.

摘要

公平的健康研究需要积极让社区参与到新知识的产生中,以倡导他们的健康需求。基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)依赖于研究人员、方案实施者和社区合作伙伴之间共同产生情境和基础知识,旨在为变革提供动力。提高共同生产能力可以支持研究质量和有效性。然而,缺乏强调所有研究伙伴为有意义和公平地做出贡献所需的理想能力和条件的框架和指导。本文旨在通过阐述可以在个体、社区、组织和系统层面促进知识生产、应用和传播中的权力共享的七个核心能力和条件来推进 CBPR。

能力是通过一个迭代过程开发的,该过程综合了来自孟加拉国、印度、肯尼亚、塞拉利昂和英国的研究人员、活动家和实施伙伴以及社区研究人员的现有文献和框架以及广泛的隐性知识。这七个核心能力和条件是:(1)解释和回应个人和关系身份、联系、独特性和不平等的能力;(2)社区和合作伙伴以最合适、最包容和最协同的方式工作的能力;(3)为超越研究重点的多维知识和技能交流创造安全和包容的空间的才能;(4)民主领导和/或促进的专业知识,以平衡竞争优先级并确保共同决策;(5)在整个研究过程中分析行动准备情况、成功和改进领域的能力;(6)能够在系统、政策和实践的政治层面启动可持续变革过程,使用倡导、游说或激进主义方法,以及(7)解释和传播可理解、尊重和促进社区所有权的发现和产出的技能。

我们提出了核心能力和条件领域、与能力相关的个人和集体专业知识、可能的结果、活动示例和证据来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2a/11574420/3bc31dcb8055/bmjgh-9-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2a/11574420/075f7c32f612/bmjgh-9-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2a/11574420/3bc31dcb8055/bmjgh-9-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2a/11574420/075f7c32f612/bmjgh-9-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2a/11574420/3bc31dcb8055/bmjgh-9-11-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Seven core competencies and conditions for equitable partnerships and power sharing in community-based participatory research.社区参与式研究中公平伙伴关系和权力分享的七个核心能力和条件。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 17;9(11):e015497. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015497.
2
Determining the competences of community based workers for disability-inclusive development in rural areas of South Africa, Botswana and Malawi.确定南非、博茨瓦纳和马拉维农村地区社区工作者在促进包容性残疾发展方面的能力。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):2919. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
3
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
'We walked side by side through the whole thing': A mixed-methods study of key elements of community-based participatory research partnerships between rural Aboriginal communities and researchers.“我们全程并肩同行”:农村原住民社区与研究人员之间基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系的关键要素的混合方法研究。
Aust J Rural Health. 2020 Aug;28(4):338-350. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12655. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
7
A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships.一个用于评估基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中健康公平促进情况的概念框架。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Oct;70:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge.基于社区的参与式研究和综合知识转化:推进知识的共同创造。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
9
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
10
Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity.基于社区的参与式研究和以人为中心的设计原则,推进听力健康公平。
Ear Hear. 2022;43(Suppl 1):33S-44S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001183. Epub 2020 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Health seeking by people living with non-communicable diseases in a pluralistic health system: the role of informal healthcare providers.多元卫生系统中慢性病患者的求医行为:非正规医疗服务提供者的作用
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 11;24(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02428-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A multi-step analysis and co-produced principles to support equitable partnership with Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, 125 years on.经过125年的发展,如今开展了多步骤分析并共同制定了原则,以支持与利物浦热带医学院建立公平的伙伴关系。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 31;4(5):e0002091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002091. eCollection 2024.
2
Group think? Questioning the individual global health expert.群体思维?质疑个体全球健康专家。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Dec;11(12):e1853-e1854. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00434-5.
3
A pragmatic approach to equitable global health partnerships in academic health sciences.
在学术健康科学领域,采取务实的方法建立公平的全球卫生伙伴关系。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011522.
4
Lessons from participatory community mapping to inform neglected tropical disease programmes in Nigeria.参与式社区绘图在尼日利亚为被忽视热带病规划提供的经验教训。
Int Health. 2023 Mar 24;15(Suppl 1):i6-i17. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac074.
5
Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review.进行范围综述的步骤。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):565-567. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1.
6
Implications of COVID-19 for safeguarding in international development research: learning, action and reflection from a research hub.新冠疫情对国际发展研究保障工作的启示:研究中心的学习、行动和反思。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008122.
7
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
8
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.英国资助的应用健康研究中的共同生产实践和未来研究重点:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x.
9
Barriers to decolonising educational partnerships in global health.去殖民化全球健康教育伙伴关系的障碍。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006964.
10
'You want to deal with power while riding on power': global perspectives on power in participatory health research and co-production approaches.“骑在权力上驾驭权力”:参与式健康研究和共同制定方法中的权力的全球视角。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006978.