Nutrition, FTI Consulting, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
FTI Consulting, Los Angeles, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 17;14(11):e086787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086787.
To estimate the health economic value of postdischarge oral nutrition supplement (ONS) consumption among elderly adults who were malnourished during hospitalisation.
A cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US payer perspective based on a recent meta-analysis of randomised trials of nutritional support following hospital discharge and studies of US hospital mortality, readmission rates and costs.
The target population of this study was postacute care US patients aged ≥65 years who were identified as malnourished during hospitalisation.
A decision-tree model was used to evaluate the impact of postacute care daily consumption of ONS compared with no ONS. Outcomes were evaluated over a 1-year time interval. Clinical outcomes of interest included readmission and mortality rates. Economic value of ONS was quantified using three different metrics: cost per death averted, cost per readmission avoided and direct cost savings resulting from changes in postacute mortality and readmission rates. The economic value of ONS was also measured by gains in quality-adjusted life-years.
Compared with patients not receiving ONS after hospital discharge, use of ONS during the postacute phase reduced mortality by 36.3% and readmissions by 11.0%. Reductions in readmissions resulted in annual savings of US$1113 per person. When extrapolating the results to the estimated 1 693 034 hospitalised elderly US adults at risk of malnutrition, the use of ONS after hospital discharge would prevent 67 747 deaths and 116 570 hospital readmissions per year. With the estimated cost of nutritional support at US$175 per patient per month corresponding to two servings ONS per day, the ONS cost per death and readmission avoided was estimated at US$4380 and US$2546, respectively.
Postdischarge use of ONS among patients at risk for malnutrition is highly cost-effective with important reductions in mortality and readmission rates.
评估出院后口服营养补充(ONS)对住院期间营养不良的老年患者的健康经济学价值。
本研究从美国支付者的角度,基于近期关于出院后营养支持的随机对照试验的荟萃分析以及美国医院死亡率、再入院率和成本研究,建立了成本效益模型。
本研究的目标人群为年龄≥65 岁的美国急性后期护理患者,这些患者在住院期间被确定为营养不良。
使用决策树模型评估了急性后期护理期间ONS 的每日摄入量与无 ONS 相比的影响。结果在 1 年时间间隔内进行评估。关注的临床结果包括再入院率和死亡率。ONS 的经济价值通过三种不同的指标进行量化:每例死亡避免的成本、每例再入院避免的成本和因急性后期死亡率和再入院率变化而导致的直接成本节约。ONS 的经济价值也通过增加的质量调整生命年来衡量。
与出院后未接受 ONS 的患者相比,ONS 的使用使死亡率降低了 36.3%,再入院率降低了 11.0%。再入院率的降低导致每人每年节省 1113 美元。将结果外推至估计有 1693034 名有营养不良风险的住院老年美国成年人,ONS 的使用每年可预防 67747 例死亡和 116570 例医院再入院。估计营养支持的费用为每位患者每月 175 美元,相当于每天两份 ONS,ONS 避免死亡和再入院的成本分别估计为 4380 美元和 2546 美元。
ONS 出院后在有营养不良风险的患者中的使用具有很高的成本效益,死亡率和再入院率显著降低。