Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Department of Research and Technology, Advanced Bionics LLC, Valencia, CA, USA.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 17;14(1):28366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79528-3.
Cochlear implants (CI) are one of the most successful treatments available to enable individuals with severe to profound hearing loss to regain access to the world of sound. This is accomplished through the electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using electrodes implanted inside the cochlea. The use of subjective user feedback makes the process of fitting these devices much more challenging in cases where users are not able to actively or accurately report their experience (e.g. pediatrics), making an objective measurement that reflects the accuracy or effectiveness of a program quite attractive. We recorded one objective measure, the electrically-stimulated cortical auditory evoked potential (eCAEP), non-invasively using the CI in response to a simulated speech sound in seven adult participants and compared it to their eCAEP recorded using a scalp EEG set-up. The eCAEPs recorded with CI electrodes were comparable to scalp recorded eCAEPs (grand mean cross-correlation of r = 0.83, individual mean cross-correlations ranged from 0.13 to 0.70). Evoked potential peaks P1, N1 and P2 showed no significant latency difference based on if the eCAEP was recorded on the scalp or using the CI. The eCAEP waveforms recorded via the CI appear to converge in a distinct P1-N1-P2 waveform by as early as 130 sweeps. In conclusion, in this study we show the feasibility of recording the eCAEP directly through the CI system, which could potentially be used to guide CI fitting and track auditory cortex development in response to CI use.
人工耳蜗植入 (CI) 是最成功的治疗方法之一,可使重度至极重度听力损失的个体重新获得声音世界的感知。这是通过将电极植入耳蜗内,对听神经进行电刺激来实现的。在用户无法主动或准确报告其体验的情况下(例如儿科患者),使用主观用户反馈会使这些设备的适配过程变得更加具有挑战性,因此,能够反映程序准确性或有效性的客观测量方法非常有吸引力。我们记录了一项客观测量指标,即使用 CI 对模拟语音刺激产生的电刺激皮质听觉诱发电位 (eCAEP),该测量方法是非侵入性的,并将其与使用头皮 EEG 设备记录的 eCAEP 进行了比较。使用 CI 电极记录的 eCAEPs 与头皮记录的 eCAEPs 具有可比性(总体平均互相关系数 r = 0.83,个体平均互相关系数范围为 0.13 至 0.70)。基于 eCAEP 是在头皮上记录还是使用 CI 记录,诱发电位峰值 P1、N1 和 P2 没有显示出明显的潜伏期差异。通过 CI 记录的 eCAEP 波形似乎早在 130 次扫掠时就会收敛为明显的 P1-N1-P2 波形。总之,在这项研究中,我们展示了通过 CI 系统直接记录 eCAEP 的可行性,这可能有助于指导 CI 适配并跟踪对 CI 使用的听觉皮层发育。