• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚产前护理中的共享决策和体重指数:探索性 OPTION12 评估。

Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Western Health Partnership, Sunshine, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70107. doi: 10.1111/hex.70107.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70107
PMID:39552115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making is recommended as a person-centred approach to decision-making in antenatal care. Little is known about the implementation of shared decision-making in antenatal care.

OBJECTIVE

An exploratory study to understand how shared decision-making is implemented in antenatal clinics and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians' use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women.

METHODS

Twenty-six antenatal clinic consultations were audio-recorded with maternity clinicians and women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m, and a comparison group of women with body mass index 18.5-24.9 kg/m. Data were analysed quantitatively using the OPTION12 scale. Narrative case studies are presented to compare shared decision-making behaviour related to induction of labour.

RESULTS

Twelve clinicians and 26 pregnant women were recruited to the study. The total scores ranged from 0 to 24, with a mean score of 9 and a median of 9.5 indicating low implementation of shared decision-making by clinicians and limited involvement of women in decision-making. No difference was observed in OPTION12 scores in decision-making for women by body mass index.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that shared decision-making is limited in the antenatal clinic setting for all women, regardless of body mass index. Further research is required to confirm the findings of this exploratory study.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The perspectives of women with body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m informed many aspects of this study including the language/terminology adopted by researchers. A consumer group reviewed the language used in the study materials, to ensure readability and avoidance of stigmatising terminology.

摘要

背景

共享决策被推荐为一种以患者为中心的产前保健决策方法。对于产前保健中共享决策的实施情况知之甚少。

目的

本探索性研究旨在了解共享决策如何在产前诊所实施,以及体重指数(BMI)是否会影响产科临床医生在为 BMI≥35kg/m2 的女性提供产前护理时使用共享决策。

方法

对 26 次有产科临床医生和 BMI≥35kg/m2 的女性以及 BMI 为 18.5-24.9kg/m2 的女性参加的产前诊所咨询进行录音,并使用 OPTION12 量表对数据进行定量分析。通过叙述性案例研究比较与引产相关的共享决策行为。

结果

本研究共招募了 12 名临床医生和 26 名孕妇。总分为 0-24 分,平均得分为 9 分,中位数为 9.5 分,表明临床医生的共享决策实施程度较低,女性参与决策的程度有限。BMI 对决策无影响。

结论

本研究表明,无论 BMI 如何,共享决策在产前诊所的实施都受到限制。需要进一步研究来证实这项探索性研究的结果。

患者或公众贡献

BMI≥35kg/m2 的女性的观点为这项研究的许多方面提供了信息,包括研究人员采用的语言/术语。一个消费者小组审查了研究材料中使用的语言,以确保易读性并避免使用污名化术语。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/85dff06330a7/HEX-27-e70107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/9ed0ba7fe14c/HEX-27-e70107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/4499815163e6/HEX-27-e70107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/85dff06330a7/HEX-27-e70107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/9ed0ba7fe14c/HEX-27-e70107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/4499815163e6/HEX-27-e70107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae40/11570676/85dff06330a7/HEX-27-e70107-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation.澳大利亚产前护理中的共享决策和体重指数:探索性 OPTION12 评估。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70107. doi: 10.1111/hex.70107.
2
"In an ideal world": A qualitative exploration of shared decision-making and weight stigma in antenatal care.在理想世界中:产前护理中共享决策和体重污名的定性探索。
Women Birth. 2024 Nov;37(6):101824. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101824. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
"Ask for my ideas first": Experiences of antenatal care and shared decision-making for women with high body mass index.“先征求我的意见”:超重孕妇的产前保健和共同决策体验。
Women Birth. 2024 Sep;37(5):101646. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101646. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
4
Maternity clinician use of shared decision-making in antenatal care: A scoping review.产科临床医生在产前护理中使用共同决策:一项范围综述。
Birth. 2024 Sep;51(3):475-483. doi: 10.1111/birt.12805. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Shared decision aids in pregnancy care: A scoping review.妊娠护理中的共享决策辅助工具:范围综述。
Midwifery. 2020 Feb;81:102589. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102589. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
6
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.母亲决策自主权(MADM)量表:一种用于评估产妇护理体验的新工具的患者主导开发及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
7
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.
8
Piloting a shared decision-making clinician training intervention in maternity care in Australia: A mixed methods study.在澳大利亚的产妇护理中试行共享决策制定临床医生培训干预措施:一项混合方法研究。
Midwifery. 2023 Nov;126:103828. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103828. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
9
Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.从女性视角看助产士的同理心和共同决策 - 评估敏感性,以比较产前和产科护理的护理质量。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05041-y.
10
On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care.友好关系:一项关于产科护理中共同决策的德尔菲研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 9;14:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-223.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.患者特征及临床医生在决策中让患者参与的程度:汇总数据的二次分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):346-356. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241231721. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Maternity clinician use of shared decision-making in antenatal care: A scoping review.产科临床医生在产前护理中使用共同决策:一项范围综述。
Birth. 2024 Sep;51(3):475-483. doi: 10.1111/birt.12805. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3
Women's Suggestions for How To Reduce Weight Stigma in Prenatal Clinical Settings.
女性对减少产前临床环境中体重歧视的建议。
Nurs Womens Health. 2021 Apr;25(2):112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Increases in Prepregnancy Obesity: United States, 2016-2019.孕前肥胖率上升:美国,2016-2019 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Nov(392):1-8.
5
What are the experiences of women with obesity receiving antenatal maternity care? A scoping review of qualitative evidence.肥胖女性接受产前产妇保健的体验是什么?定性证据的范围综述。
Women Birth. 2021 Sep;34(5):435-446. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
6
The content and conduct of GP consultations for dermatology problems: a cross-sectional study.全科医生皮肤科就诊内容和行为:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Oct 1;70(699):e723-e730. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712577. Print 2020 Oct.
7
The Impact of Shared Decision-Making in Perinatal Care: A Scoping Review.围产期护理中共享决策的影响:范围综述。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Nov;65(6):777-788. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13128. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
Shared Decision-Making Measures: A Systematic Review.共享决策措施:系统评价。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Apr/Jun;29(2):54-66. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000250.
9
Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.产妇护理中的共享决策:承认和克服认识上的反驳。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1113-1120. doi: 10.1111/jep.13243. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
10
The psychological burden of baby weight: Pregnancy, weight stigma, and maternal health.婴儿体重带来的心理负担:怀孕、体重歧视与产妇健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;235:112401. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112401. Epub 2019 Jul 9.