School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Academie Verloskunde Maastricht, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Nov;65(6):777-788. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13128. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
Shared decision-making is considered to be a key aspect of woman-centered care and a strategy to improve communication, respect, and satisfaction. This scoping review identified studies that used a shared decision-making support strategy as the primary intervention in the context of perinatal care.
A literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases was completed for English-language studies conducted from January 2000 through November 2019 that examined the impact of a shared decision-making support strategy on a perinatal decision (such as choice of mode of birth after prior cesarean birth). Studies that only examined the use of a decision aid were excluded. Nine studies met inclusion criteria and were examined for the nature of the shared decision-making intervention as well as outcome measures such as decisional evaluation, including decisional conflict, decisional regret, and certainty.
The 9 included studies were heterogeneous with regard to shared decision-making interventions and measured outcomes and were performed in different countries and in a variety of perinatal situations, such as women facing the choice of mode of birth after prior cesarean birth. The impact of a shared decision-making intervention on women's perception of shared decision-making and on their experiences of the decision-making process were mixed. There may be a decrease in decisional conflict and regret related to feeling informed, but no change in decisional certainty.
Despite the call to increase the use of shared decision-making in perinatal care, there are few studies that have examined the effects of a shared decision-making support strategy. Further studies that include antepartum and intrapartum settings, which include common perinatal decisions such as induction of labor, are needed. In addition, clear guidance and strategies for successfully integrating shared decision-making and practice recommendations would help women and health care providers navigate these complex decisions.
共同决策被认为是以人为本的护理的关键方面,也是改善沟通、尊重和满意度的策略。本范围综述确定了在围产期护理背景下将共同决策支持策略作为主要干预措施的研究。
对 PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、PsycINFO 和 SCOPUS 数据库进行了文献检索,检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 11 月期间发表的英语研究,这些研究考察了共同决策支持策略对围产期决策(如择剖宫产术后分娩方式)的影响。仅检查使用决策辅助工具的研究被排除在外。符合纳入标准的 9 项研究被检查了共同决策干预的性质以及决策评估的结果测量指标,包括决策冲突、决策后悔和确定性。
9 项纳入研究在共同决策干预和测量结果方面存在异质性,并且在不同国家和各种围产期情况下进行,例如面临择剖宫产术后分娩方式的女性。共同决策干预对女性对共同决策的感知以及对决策过程的体验的影响不一。与感到知情相关的决策冲突和后悔可能会减少,但决策确定性没有变化。
尽管呼吁增加在围产期护理中使用共同决策,但很少有研究检查共同决策支持策略的效果。需要进一步研究包括产前和产时环境的研究,包括常见的围产期决策,如引产。此外,明确指导和成功整合共同决策和实践建议的策略将有助于女性和医疗保健提供者应对这些复杂的决策。