Suppr超能文献

基于超声向量血流成像的血流动力学双参数评价高危人群颈动脉狭窄

Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis in a High-Stroke-Risk Population by Hemodynamic Dual-Parameters Based on Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2024 Nov;14(11):e70150. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70150.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study explored the feasibility of using high-frame-rate ultrasound vector flow imaging (VFI) to quantitatively assess hemodynamics in atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) by evaluating dual-parameters, turbulence index (Tur), and wall shear stress (WSS). Their efficacy in evaluating carotid artery stenosis was also analyzed.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients with ICAS were enrolled. B-mode ultrasound and V Flow (a high-frame-rate VFI) were performed using the Resona R9 system. The stenosis rate was measured in grayscale mode, whereas the time-averaged Tur index, the time-averaged WSS (WSS), and maximum WSS (WSS) around stenosis were measured. The combined diagnostic efficacy of Tur inand WSS was also investigated.

RESULTS

Compared to proximal to stenosis (Tur index, 2.88% ± 3.65%), highly disordered blood flow was observed in the stenotic (23.17% ± 15.52%, p < 0.001) and distal segment (25.86% ± 17.29%, p < 0.001). WSS ([11.91 ± 6.73] vs. [4.43 ± 5.4] Pa, p < 0.001) and WSS ([3.42 ± 2.67] vs. [0.86 ± 1.21] Pa, p < 0.001) were significantly bigger in stenotic than those in the distal segment. The differences in the ratio WSS/Tur or WSS/Tur among different segments around stenosis were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The combination of Tur index and WSS had the best diagnostic performance in ICAS (AUC, 0.899).

CONCLUSION

The application of Tur index and WSS for quantitative assessment of ICAS hemodynamic changes is feasible, with the combined evaluation of these two parameters providing incremental diagnostic value for carotid artery stenosis. VFI-based dual quantitative parameters may offer promising noninvasive diagnostic tools for carotid artery stenosis in high-stroke-risk populations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过评估双参数(湍流指数 Tur 和壁面切应力 WSS),探讨使用高帧率超声向量血流成像(VFI)定量评估动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉狭窄(ICAS)血流动力学的可行性。同时分析这些参数评估颈动脉狭窄的效能。

方法

纳入 59 例 ICAS 患者,使用 Resona R9 系统进行 B 超和 VFlow(高帧率 VFI)检查。灰阶模式测量狭窄率,测量狭窄处及狭窄近端和远端的平均 Tur 指数、平均 WSS(WSS)和最大 WSS(WSS)。还研究了 Tur 和 WSS 的联合诊断效能。

结果

与狭窄近端相比(Tur 指数为 2.88%±3.65%),狭窄处和狭窄远段血流紊乱程度明显增加(23.17%±15.52%,p<0.001;25.86%±17.29%,p<0.001)。狭窄处的 WSS([11.91±6.73] Pa 比 [4.43±5.4] Pa,p<0.001)和 WSS([3.42±2.67] Pa 比 [0.86±1.21] Pa,p<0.001)均显著大于狭窄远段。狭窄处及狭窄远段与狭窄近端之间的 WSS/Tur 或 WSS/Tur 比值差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。Tur 指数和 WSS 联合诊断 ICAS 的效能最佳(AUC 为 0.899)。

结论

应用 Tur 指数和 WSS 定量评估 ICAS 血流动力学变化是可行的,联合评估这两个参数对颈动脉狭窄具有附加诊断价值。基于 VFI 的双定量参数可能为高卒中风险人群的颈动脉狭窄提供有前途的无创诊断工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72a8/11570680/4c29df29054a/BRB3-14-e70150-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验