Summit Alynna G, Moseley Madison C, Chaku Natasha, Elam Kit K, Jacobs Wura, Lederer Alyssa M, Vaughan Ellen L, Quinn Patrick D
Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Addiction. 2025 Apr;120(4):721-731. doi: 10.1111/add.16716. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
Increasing rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) pharmacotherapy may simultaneously benefit patients and increase the availability of stimulants for misuse. We measured the association between university-level prevalence of ADHD medication treatment and prevalence of prescription stimulant misuse (PSM) among college students.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an observational study using cross-sectional data from the American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment III. Data included 395 participating universities between Fall 2019 and Fall 2022. Our sample included 224 469 undergraduates aged 18-25 years (65.2% cisgender female; 58.7% White).
Students self-reported any life-time clinical ADHD diagnosis, past-year ADHD medication treatment and past-3-month PSM. We defined university-level ADHD medication prevalence as the proportion of included students endorsing past-year ADHD medication treatment. Secondary outcomes included life-time PSM and moderate- to high-risk alcohol and cannabis use. We also measured university-level depression medication prevalence as a negative control exposure.
Among the included students, 9.6% reported a life-time clinical ADHD diagnosis, 5.1% reported past-year medication treatment and 2.4% reported past-3-month PSM. The prevalence of ADHD medication treatment varied among universities [mean = 5.3%, standard deviation (SD) = 2.8%]. In adjusted models, prevalence of PSM was 7% relatively greater for every 1% increase in university-level medication prevalence [adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.09]. Further, individuals with non-medication-treated ADHD were 40% more likely to report PSM than those without ADHD (aPR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.25-1.56). There was no statistically significant difference in PSM among individuals with ADHD who did or did not receive medication (aPR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.78-1.04). Results for secondary outcomes and the negative control partially supported the specificity of the findings.
Among university students in the United States, there appears to be a positive association between attending universities with a greater prevalence of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication treatment and risk of prescription stimulant misuse (PSM). This study provides further support for the possibility that ADHD medication treatment prevalence is a risk factor for PSM.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)药物治疗率的上升可能在使患者受益的同时,也增加了兴奋剂被滥用的可能性。我们测量了大学层面ADHD药物治疗的患病率与大学生中处方兴奋剂滥用(PSM)患病率之间的关联。
设计、背景与参与者:这是一项观察性研究,使用了来自美国大学健康协会-全国大学健康评估III的横断面数据。数据包括2019年秋季至2022年秋季期间的395所参与大学。我们的样本包括224469名年龄在18至25岁之间的本科生(65.2%为顺性别女性;58.7%为白人)。
学生自我报告任何一生的临床ADHD诊断、过去一年的ADHD药物治疗以及过去三个月的PSM情况。我们将大学层面的ADHD药物治疗患病率定义为认可过去一年接受ADHD药物治疗的学生比例。次要结果包括一生的PSM以及中度至高度风险的酒精和大麻使用情况。我们还测量了大学层面的抑郁症药物治疗患病率作为阴性对照暴露因素。
在纳入的学生中,9.6%报告有一生的临床ADHD诊断,5.1%报告过去一年接受药物治疗,2.4%报告过去三个月有PSM。ADHD药物治疗的患病率在各大学之间有所不同[平均值 = 5.3%,标准差(SD)= 2.8%]。在调整模型中,大学层面药物治疗患病率每增加1%,PSM的患病率相对增加7%[调整患病率比值(aPR)= 1.07;95%置信区间(CI)= 1.04 - 1.09]。此外,未接受药物治疗的ADHD患者报告PSM的可能性比没有ADHD的人高40%(aPR = 1.40;95% CI = 1.25 - 1.56)。接受或未接受药物治疗的ADHD患者在PSM方面没有统计学上的显著差异(aPR = 0.90;95% CI = 0.78 - 1.04)。次要结果和阴性对照的结果部分支持了研究结果的特异性。
在美国大学生中,就读于ADHD药物治疗患病率较高的大学与处方兴奋剂滥用(PSM)风险之间似乎存在正相关。这项研究进一步支持了ADHD药物治疗患病率是PSM一个风险因素的可能性。