Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 18;40(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000618.
International development agendas increasingly push for access to healthcare for all through universal healthcare coverage. Health economic evaluations and health technology assessment (HTA) could provide evidence to support this but do not routinely incorporate consideration of equitable access.
We undertook an international scoping review of health economic evaluation and HTA guidelines to examine how well issues of healthcare access and equity are represented, evidence recommendations, and gaps in current guidance to support evidence generation in this area. Guidelines were sourced from guideline repositories and websites of international agencies and organizations providing best practice methods guidance. Articles providing methods guidance for the conduct of HTA, or health economic evaluation, were included, except where they were not available in English and a suitable translation could not be obtained.
The search yielded forty-seven national, four international, and nine independent guidelines, along with eighty-six articles providing specific methods guidance. The inclusion of equity and access considerations in current guidance is extremely limited. Where they do feature, detail on specific methods for providing evidence on these issues is sparse.
Economic evaluation could be a valuable tool to provide evidence for the best healthcare strategies that not only maximize health but also ensure equitable access to care for all. Such evidence would be invaluable in supporting progress towards universal healthcare coverage. Clear guidance is required to ensure evaluations provide evidence on the best strategies to support equitable access to healthcare, but such guidance rarely exists in current best practice and guidance documents.
国际发展议程越来越多地推动通过全民医保覆盖来实现全民获得医疗保健的机会。健康经济评估和卫生技术评估(HTA)可以提供支持这一目标的证据,但通常不考虑公平获得医疗保健的问题。
我们对健康经济评估和 HTA 指南进行了国际范围的综述,以考察在多大程度上代表了医疗保健可及性和公平性问题、证据建议以及当前指导中的差距,以支持该领域的证据生成。指南来自指南库以及提供最佳实践方法指南的国际机构和组织的网站。纳入了提供 HTA 或健康经济评估方法指导的文章,但不包括英文以外的文章,且无法获得合适的翻译。
搜索结果包括 47 项国家指南、4 项国际指南和 9 项独立指南,以及 86 篇提供具体方法指导的文章。当前指南中对公平性和可及性问题的考虑极为有限。即使有涉及,关于提供这些问题证据的具体方法的细节也很少。
经济评估可以成为提供最佳医疗保健策略证据的有价值工具,这些策略不仅可以最大限度地提高健康水平,还可以确保所有人都能公平地获得医疗保健。这种证据对于支持实现全民医保覆盖的进展将是非常宝贵的。需要明确的指导,以确保评估提供有关支持公平获得医疗保健的最佳策略的证据,但这种指导在当前的最佳实践和指导文件中很少存在。