Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University and Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Nov 18;39(Supplement_2):i39-i53. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae043.
Policy engagement is an essential component of implementation research for scaling up interventions targeting non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It refers to the many ways that research team members, implementers and policymakers, who represent government decision-making, connect and interact to explore common interests. Well-conducted engagement activities foster co-production, local contextualization and assist in the successful translation of research evidence into policy and practice. We aimed to identify the challenges and facilitators to policy engagement during the early implementation phase of scale-up research studies. This qualitative study was focused on the research projects that were funded through the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases in the 2019 round. Nineteen project teams opted to participate, with these studies implemented in 20 countries. Forty-three semi-structured stakeholder interviews, representing research, implementation and government were undertaken between August 2020 and July 2021. Transcripts were open-coded using thematic analysis to extract 63 codes which generated 15 themes reflecting both challenges and facilitators to undertaking policy engagement. Knowledge of the local government structures and trusting relationships provided the foundation for successful engagement and were strengthened by the research. Four cross-cutting concepts for engagement were identified and included: (1) the importance of understanding the policy landscape; (2) facilitating a network of suitable policy champions, (3) providing an environment for policy leaders to genuinely contribute to co-creation and (4) promoting two-way learning during researcher-policymaker engagement. We recommend undertaking formative policy analysis to gain a strategic understanding of the policy landscape and develop targeted engagement plans. Through engagement, researchers must facilitate cohesive vision and build a team of policy champions to advocate NCD research within their networks and spheres of influence. Ensuring equitable partnerships is essential for enabling local ownership and leadership. Further, engagement efforts must create a synergistic policymaker-researcher lens to promote the uptake of evidence into policy.
政策参与是扩大针对非传染性疾病(NCDs)干预措施的实施研究的重要组成部分。它是指研究团队成员、实施者和政策制定者(代表政府决策)为了探索共同利益而进行的多种联系和互动方式。精心开展的参与活动有助于共同制定政策、进行本土化调整,并协助成功地将研究证据转化为政策和实践。我们旨在确定在扩大研究实施的早期阶段进行政策参与的挑战和促进因素。这项定性研究侧重于通过全球慢性病联盟在 2019 年资助的研究项目。有 19 个项目团队选择参与,这些研究在 20 个国家实施。2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 7 月期间,进行了 43 次代表研究、实施和政府的半结构化利益相关者访谈。使用主题分析对转录本进行开放式编码,以提取 63 个代码,这些代码生成了 15 个主题,反映了进行政策参与的挑战和促进因素。对当地政府结构的了解和信任关系为成功的参与提供了基础,并通过研究得到了加强。确定了四个贯穿始终的参与概念,包括:(1)了解政策环境的重要性;(2)促进合适的政策拥护者网络的形成,(3)为政策领导人提供真正为共同创造做出贡献的环境,以及(4)在研究人员与政策制定者的参与中促进双向学习。我们建议进行形成性政策分析,以获得对政策环境的战略理解并制定有针对性的参与计划。通过参与,研究人员必须促进凝聚力的愿景,并建立一个政策拥护者团队,在其网络和影响范围内倡导 NCD 研究。确保公平的伙伴关系对于实现本地所有权和领导力至关重要。此外,参与工作必须建立一个协同的政策制定者-研究人员视角,以促进将证据纳入政策。