• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Survivorship and outcomes of arthroscopic bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocations: A minimum of 2 year follow-up.肩关节前脱位关节镜下Bankart修复术的生存率及预后:至少2年的随访
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Nov 13:17585732241280247. doi: 10.1177/17585732241280247.
2
Comparison of anterior single- and standard two-portal techniques in arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术中单前入路与标准双入路技术的比较。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32(2):437-445. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2021.79712. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Patients without re-dislocation in the short term after arthroscopic knotless Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability may show residual apprehension and recurrence in the long term after 5 years.对于前肩不稳进行关节镜下无结Bankart修复术后短期内未再脱位的患者,5年后长期可能会出现残余的恐惧和复发。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 May;31(5):978-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.042. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Threshold scores for treatment success after arthroscopic bankart repair using Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, Constant-Murley Score, and UCLA shoulder score.使用牛津肩部不稳定评分、Constant-Murley评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分评估关节镜下Bankart修复术后治疗成功的阈值分数。
J Orthop. 2020 May 7;22:242-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
5
[Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Remplissage for Anterior Instability: Functional Outcomes, Risk of Failure].关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage治疗前向不稳:功能结果及失败风险
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(6):406-414.
6
Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study.Bankart 修复术联合下囊转移术与单纯关节镜 Bankart 修复术治疗撞击运动员复发性肩关节前向不稳定的前瞻性研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec;33(12):2572-2579. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.041. Epub 2024 May 10.
7
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.关节镜下 Latarjet 术作为初次关节镜 Bankart 修复失败后的翻修手术的疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jan;52(1):190-200. doi: 10.1177/03635465231209986.
9
Good clinical outcomes and low recurrence rate in patients undergoing arthroscopic revision Latarjet for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.关节镜下翻修 Latarjet 术治疗失败的关节镜 Bankart 修复术患者的临床疗效良好且复发率低。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec;33(12):2842-2849. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.054. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
10
Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Labroligamentous Periosteal Sleeve Avulsion Lesions: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.关节镜下前盂唇-骨膜袖套撕脱病变的疗效:至少 2 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1512-1519. doi: 10.1177/03635465221090902. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes and thresholds in the Oxford Shoulder Score following shoulder arthroplasty: Minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state.肩关节置换术后牛津肩部评分的变化及阈值:最小临床重要差异、最小重要及可检测变化以及患者可接受症状状态
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Oct;16(5):507-517. doi: 10.1177/17585732231176423. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Controversies in surgical management of anterior shoulder instability. State of the Art.前肩不稳的手术治疗争议。最新进展。
J ISAKOS. 2024 Apr;9(2):168-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.10.008. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
3
Patients Have a 15% Redislocation Rate After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With a Knotless Technique.采用无结技术进行关节镜下Bankart修复术后,患者的再脱位率为15%。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan 14;6(1):100864. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100864. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative treatment for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术与初次创伤性前肩脱位的保守治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 27;28(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01160-0.
5
Increased Failure Rates After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair After Second Dislocation Compared to Primary Dislocation With Comparable Clinical Outcomes.与初次脱位相比,二次脱位后关节镜下Bankart修复术后失败率增加,但临床结果相当。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Mar;39(3):682-688. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
6
Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Oxford, Constant, and University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scores After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty to Allow Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Future Statistical Power Analyses.反向肩关节置换术后牛津、常数和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分的最小临床重要差异,以允许解释患者报告的结果测量和未来的统计功效分析。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Jun;39(6):1405-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.027. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
7
Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength.年龄对肩部活动范围和力量的影响。
JSES Int. 2022 Sep 14;6(6):1029-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
No Difference Between Anchorless and Traditional Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Clinical Comparison.关节镜下Bankart修复术中无锚钉与传统缝合锚钉的比较:一项临床对比研究
Cureus. 2022 Jul 18;14(7):e26988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26988. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair for Anterior Instability of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review.关节镜下骨 Bankart 修复治疗肩关节前向不稳定的临床疗效:系统评价
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;51(10):2758-2765. doi: 10.1177/03635465221094832. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
Can We Identify Why Athletes Fail to Return to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.我们能否确定关节镜下Bankart修复术后运动员无法重返运动的原因?一项系统评价和Meta分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Jul;51(9):2480-2486. doi: 10.1177/03635465221089980. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

肩关节前脱位关节镜下Bankart修复术的生存率及预后:至少2年的随访

Survivorship and outcomes of arthroscopic bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocations: A minimum of 2 year follow-up.

作者信息

Lim Kia Teng, Tan Wei Ping Marcus, Tan Andrew Hwee Chye

机构信息

Ministry of Health Holdings Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Current address: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Nov 13:17585732241280247. doi: 10.1177/17585732241280247.

DOI:10.1177/17585732241280247
PMID:39552688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562411/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate long-term survivorship of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR).

METHODS

About 101 patients under a single surgeon were followed up for ≥2 years post-ABR. Primary outcome was survivorship, defined as re-dislocation post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included a range of motion, strength, pain, University of California-Los-Angeles shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS), Constant Murley Score, and satisfaction. Clinical factors were correlated.

RESULTS

Eight patients experienced postoperative dislocation (5 high-energy trauma, 2 low-energy trauma, 1 atraumatic), with 2 patients requiring revision. The mean time to post-operative dislocation was 1.5 years (range 0.3-3.8). Competitive athletes demonstrated worse survivorship (p = 0.027) but greater isometric strength at 6 months (p = 0.041) compared to recreational players. Patients ≥25 years old experienced slower recovery of internal rotation at 3 months (p = 0.006). Patients with surgery >1 year after injury had slower recovery of external rotation (p = 0.006), worse Constant scores at 3 months (p = 0.036) and lesser improvements in isometric strength at 3 months (p = 0.032). Patients with single pre-operative dislocations (p = 0.036 OSS; p = 0.039 OSIS) and patients ≥25 years old (p = 0.044 OSS) had worse Oxford scores at 3 months.

DISCUSSION

ABR demonstrates good outcomes with low recurrence. This study prognosticates long-term outcomes across various subgroups.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估关节镜下Bankart修复术(ABR)的长期生存率。

方法

对同一位外科医生治疗的约101例患者进行ABR术后至少2年的随访。主要结局为生存率,定义为术后再脱位。次要结局包括活动范围、力量、疼痛、加州大学洛杉矶分校肩关节评分、牛津肩关节评分(OSS)、牛津肩关节不稳定评分(OSIS)、Constant Murley评分和满意度。对临床因素进行相关性分析。

结果

8例患者发生术后脱位(5例高能量创伤,2例低能量创伤,1例无创伤),2例患者需要翻修。术后脱位的平均时间为1.5年(范围0.3 - 3.8年)。与业余运动员相比,竞技运动员的生存率较差(p = 0.027),但在6个月时等长力量更大(p = 0.041)。25岁及以上的患者在3个月时内旋恢复较慢(p = 0.006)。受伤后1年以上接受手术的患者外旋恢复较慢(p = 0.006),3个月时Constant评分较差(p = 0.036),3个月时等长力量改善较小(p = 0.032)。术前有单次脱位的患者(OSS,p = 0.036;OSIS,p = 0.039)和25岁及以上的患者(OSS,p = 0.044)在3个月时牛津评分较差。

讨论

ABR显示出良好的疗效且复发率低。本研究对各亚组的长期结局进行了预测。