• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项倾向评分匹配分析,以评估辅助治疗对R0食管切除术后食管鳞状细胞癌疾病复发的益处。

A propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the benefit of adjuvant therapy on disease recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.

作者信息

Cao Yuqin, Hu Qingqing, Zhang Yajie, Li Chengqiang, Zhou Yuan, Zhang Yongjing, Qiu Hong, Li Hecheng

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Global Epidemiology, Office of Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6651-6663. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-806. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-806
PMID:39552908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565312/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common in China and has a poor prognosis despite radical surgery. Guidelines around the use of adjuvant therapy (AT) in ESCC are indecisive. We assessed the benefit of AT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) in Chinese patients with ESCC using propensity score (PS) matching.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) of 523 adults diagnosed between 2013 to 2019 with pathologically confirmed ESCC after R0 esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. PSs were calculated using a generalized linear regression model based on demographic, clinical, and pathologic features. Patients with and without AT were matched using nearest neighbor method and caliper value 0.05. Subgroup analyses were stratified by PS.

RESULTS

Younger patients with more advanced/poorly differentiated disease were more likely to receive AT (P<0.05). There were 137 matched pairs in the AT/No AT groups. After matching, the AT group tended to have longer median RFS [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.21 years (1.54-3.20)] than the No AT group [1.75 years (1.37-2.21)] (P=0.18). The benefit was significant in patients with PS ≥0.40 [hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, median RFS (95% CI): 2.22 years (1.30-3.52) versus 1.23 years (0.90-1.64), P=0.03]. In other PS subgroups, median RFS was similar in AT and No AT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for baseline characteristics, AT tended to improve RFS after R0 esophagectomy in Chinese patients, with significant benefit associated with a higher PS score. The utility of PS to guide patient selection for AT in clinical practice needs further investigation.

摘要

背景

食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)在中国很常见,尽管进行了根治性手术,但其预后仍很差。关于ESCC辅助治疗(AT)使用的指南并不明确。我们使用倾向评分(PS)匹配评估了AT对中国ESCC患者无复发生存期(RFS)的益处。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了2013年至2019年间523名成人的医院电子病历(EMR),这些患者经病理确诊为ESCC,接受了R0食管切除术后未进行新辅助治疗。使用基于人口统计学、临床和病理特征的广义线性回归模型计算PS。使用最近邻法和卡尺值0.05对接受和未接受AT的患者进行匹配。亚组分析按PS分层。

结果

年龄较小、疾病分期较晚/分化较差的患者更有可能接受AT(P<0.05)。AT/非AT组有137对匹配对。匹配后,AT组的中位RFS往往长于非AT组[95%置信区间(CI):2.21年(1.54 - 3.20)],非AT组为[1.75年(1.37 - 2.21)](P = 0.18)。在PS≥0.40的患者中,益处显著[风险比0.55,95%CI:0.32 - 0.87,中位RFS(95%CI):2.22年(1.30 - 3.52)对1.23年(0.90 - 1.64),P = 0.03]。在其他PS亚组中,AT组和非AT组的中位RFS相似。

结论

在调整基线特征后,AT倾向于改善中国患者R0食管切除术后的RFS,较高的PS评分与显著益处相关。PS在临床实践中指导患者选择AT的效用需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/829887c5f309/jtd-16-10-6651-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/015ed973108a/jtd-16-10-6651-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/e6c6749ba7b6/jtd-16-10-6651-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/829887c5f309/jtd-16-10-6651-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/015ed973108a/jtd-16-10-6651-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/e6c6749ba7b6/jtd-16-10-6651-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4173/11565312/829887c5f309/jtd-16-10-6651-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
A propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the benefit of adjuvant therapy on disease recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.一项倾向评分匹配分析,以评估辅助治疗对R0食管切除术后食管鳞状细胞癌疾病复发的益处。
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6651-6663. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-806. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China.新辅助放化疗与新辅助化疗治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:来自中国国家癌症中心的一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr;148(4):943-954. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03659-7. Epub 2021 May 19.
3
Adjuvant therapy provides no additional recurrence-free benefit for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery: a multi-center propensity score match study.新辅助化疗免疫治疗及手术后,辅助治疗对食管鳞状细胞癌患者无额外的无复发生存获益:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 5;15:1332492. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1332492. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.临床III期食管鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助化疗与先行手术加或不加化疗的比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):1-8. doi: 10.1111/dote.12473.
5
A propensity-score matching analysis comparing long-term survival of surgery alone and postoperative treatment for patients in node positive or stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy.一项倾向评分匹配分析比较了 R0 食管切除术后淋巴结阳性或 III 期食管鳞癌患者单纯手术与术后治疗的长期生存。
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Nov;140:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.020. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive patients after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞癌术后淋巴结阳性患者的辅助化疗。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Feb;14(6):624-635. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14796. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for poorly differentiated superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A 10-year cohort study.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与食管切除术治疗低分化浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效:一项10年队列研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2025 Jan;57(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
8
Survival risk prediction model for patients with pT NM esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for therapeutic purposes.pT NM期食管鳞状细胞癌患者行R0食管切除术及两野淋巴结清扫术治疗后的生存风险预测模型
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 1;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01503-0.
9
The impact of adjuvant therapy on survival for node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.辅助治疗对淋巴结阴性食管鳞状细胞癌生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jun;9(12):998. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2539.
10
The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.术后辅助化疗在淋巴结阳性食管鳞状细胞癌中的作用:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Med Oncol. 2016 Apr;33(4):31. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0746-8. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Stage-Specific Survival From Esophageal Cancer in China and Implications for Control Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.中国食管癌的阶段特异性生存率及其对控制策略的启示:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Oct 31;2(3):426-437. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.10.012. eCollection 2023.
2
National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma 2022 in China (English version).《2022年中国食管癌诊疗指南(英文版)》
Chin J Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 30;34(4):309-334. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.04.01.
3
Trimodal Therapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Role of Adjuvant Therapy Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery.
食管鳞状细胞癌的三联疗法:新辅助放化疗及手术后辅助治疗的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 30;14(15):3721. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153721.
4
McKeown or Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.麦基翁或艾弗·刘易斯微创食管切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):1518-1527. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2020.01.45.
5
Survival of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.新辅助和辅助治疗与单纯手术治疗可切除食管鳞状细胞癌的生存率比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 20;11:728185. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728185. eCollection 2021.
6
Esophageal cancer: the rise of adenocarcinoma over squamous cell carcinoma in the Asian belt.食管癌:在亚洲地区腺癌发病率超过鳞状细胞癌。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Jul;12(Suppl 2):S339-S349. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2019-gi-08.
7
Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage IIB-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.根治性手术与术后辅助放化疗治疗 IIB-III 期食管鳞癌的随机对照 III 期临床研究
Oncologist. 2021 Dec;26(12):e2151-e2160. doi: 10.1002/onco.13914. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Long-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The NEOCRTEC5010 Randomized Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌的长期疗效:NEOCRTEC5010 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):721-729. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2373.
9
Is Adjuvant Therapy a Better Option for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Esophagectomy? A Prognosis Prediction Model Based on Multicenter Real-World Data.辅助治疗对接受食管切除术的食管鳞状细胞癌患者来说是更好的选择吗?基于多中心真实世界数据的预后预测模型
Ann Surg. 2023 Jan 1;277(1):e61-e69. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004958. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.纳武利尤单抗辅助治疗食管或胃食管结合部癌。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 1;384(13):1191-1203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125.