Moran C C, Cleary P J
Br J Psychol. 1986 Feb;77 ( Pt 1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb01981.x.
Sixteen subjects performed a serial reaction-time task while varying frontalis tension levels. There were three levels of induced tension variation: high, moderate and low. Results indicated that reaction times were differentially affected across the three tension levels, and the slow response end of the reaction-time distribution was slightly more sensitive to frontalis tension changes than the median. The relative importance of errors of omission and errors of commission may determine which tension level is optimal for task performance, but the results reported here indicate that attempts to reduce frontalis tension levels may be inappropriate in situations requiring sustained alertness.
16名受试者在改变额肌紧张程度的同时执行了序列反应时任务。诱导的紧张程度变化有三个水平:高、中、低。结果表明,反应时在这三个紧张水平上受到不同的影响,并且反应时分布的慢反应端比中位数对额肌紧张变化更敏感。遗漏错误和执行错误的相对重要性可能决定哪个紧张水平最适合任务表现,但此处报告的结果表明,在需要持续警觉的情况下,试图降低额肌紧张水平可能并不合适。