Suppr超能文献

合作决策:对政策制定者建议的定性系统评价

Collaborative Policymaking: a qualitative systematic review of advice for policymakers.

作者信息

Cairney Paul, Toomey Claire

机构信息

Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Stirling Division of History Heritage and Politics, Stirling, Scotland, FK94LA, UK.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2024 Sep 18;4:204. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18440.1. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex policy problems are not amenable to simple solutions by a few powerful policy actors in one central government. They require collaboration across government and between actors inside and outside of government. However, this for collaboration is no guarantee of collective action. Further, it is difficult to know how to collaborate effectively. We searched the academic and grey literature for advice on how to foster collaborative policymaking.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative systematic review (2024) of peer reviewed journal articles (Web of Science) and grey literature reports (Policy Commons). Each article or report had to inform advice on collaborative policymaking. We used an immersive and inductive approach to identify key themes and relate the results to well-established insights from policy theories.

RESULTS

86 texts meet the inclusion criteria (49 Web of Science, 37 Policy Commons). Most provide broad definitions of collaborative policymaking, which are similar to definitions of collaborative governance (and connected aims such as policy co-creation). Many assert or assume that greater collaboration, across and inside/outside of government, will improve policymaking and policy. Few individual studies give advice on how to collaborate effectively, but they combine to identify common features of collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

We synthesise the available advice to identify five main features of collaborative policymaking: plan and prepare to collaborate, such as by designing rules and allocating resources; create a sense of collective purpose, such as by setting a boundary around the collaboration and co-producing a common vision; foster creative methods to visualise collaboration and design policy; create new forums to supplement formal collaboration; and clarify the roles and skills essential to each collaborative task.

摘要

背景

复杂的政策问题无法由中央政府中少数有权势的政策行为者通过简单的解决方案来解决。它们需要政府内部以及政府内外行为者之间的合作。然而,这种合作需求并不能保证采取集体行动。此外,很难知道如何进行有效的合作。我们在学术文献和灰色文献中搜索了关于如何促进合作式政策制定的建议。

方法

我们对同行评审期刊文章(科学网)和灰色文献报告(政策共享库)进行了定性系统综述(2024年)。每篇文章或报告都必须提供有关合作式政策制定的建议。我们采用沉浸式和归纳式方法来确定关键主题,并将结果与政策理论中已确立的见解联系起来。

结果

86篇文本符合纳入标准(49篇来自科学网,37篇来自政策共享库)。大多数提供了合作式政策制定的宽泛定义,这些定义与合作治理的定义(以及诸如政策共同创造等相关目标)相似。许多人断言或假设,政府内部和外部之间加强合作将改善政策制定和政策。很少有个别研究就如何进行有效合作提供建议,但它们综合起来确定了合作的共同特征。

结论

我们综合现有建议,确定合作式政策制定的五个主要特征:规划并准备好进行合作,例如通过设计规则和分配资源;营造集体使命感,例如通过设定合作边界和共同制定共同愿景;采用创造性方法来可视化合作并设计政策;创建新的论坛以补充正式合作;明确每项合作任务所需的角色和技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d29/11568374/d380615edf02/openreseurope-4-19928-g0000.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验