Wise R A, Raptis L
Brain Res. 1986 Mar 12;368(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91042-5.
Latency to initiate and duration of eating of 18 daily 5-pellet meal segments was measured in 22-h food-deprived rats under conditions of pimozide (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and naloxone (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) pretreatment. Neither drug increased latency on the first or second day of testing; pimozide increased mean latency slightly on the third test. Both drugs slowed duration scores dramatically; the slowing was progressive both within and across test sessions in the case of pimozide; it was dose-dependent and progressive within (but not across) sessions in the case of naloxone. In each case, shifts in mean duration scores. In each case, shifts in mean duration score reflected an increase in score variance caused by an increase in the number and extremity of long duration scores. In each case best scores under the drug condition were equal to best scores under control conditions; indeed, very fast latency scores were slightly more frequent under each drug on the first day of testing. Thus each drug decreased the probability of moderate scores but neither drug caused a simple change in the ability to make occasional fast responses. While the effects of the two drugs were similar in some ways, naloxone, unlike pimozide, did not completely suppress feeding.
在对22小时未进食的大鼠进行匹莫齐特(1毫克/千克,腹腔注射)和纳洛酮(2.5、5.0和10.0毫克/千克,腹腔注射)预处理的条件下,测量了18个每日5粒餐段的进食启动潜伏期和进食持续时间。在测试的第一天或第二天,两种药物均未增加潜伏期;匹莫齐特在第三次测试时略微增加了平均潜伏期。两种药物均显著减慢了持续时间得分;匹莫齐特在测试期间内和跨测试期间的减慢都是渐进的;纳洛酮在测试期间内(但不是跨测试期间)是剂量依赖性且渐进的。在每种情况下,平均持续时间得分都发生了变化。在每种情况下,平均持续时间得分的变化反映了由于长时间得分的数量和极端程度增加而导致的得分方差增加。在每种情况下,药物条件下的最佳得分与对照条件下的最佳得分相等;实际上,在测试的第一天,每种药物下非常快的潜伏期得分略为更频繁。因此,每种药物都降低了中等得分的概率,但两种药物都没有导致偶尔做出快速反应的能力发生简单变化。虽然两种药物的作用在某些方面相似,但与匹莫齐特不同,纳洛酮并没有完全抑制进食。